Literature DB >> 1407935

Natural oocyte retrieval with intravaginal fertilization: a simplified approach to in vitro fertilization.

M L Taymor1, C J Ranoux, G L Gross.   

Abstract

To simplify in vitro fertilization (IVF), we have combined natural-cycle oocyte retrieval with intravaginal fertilization. Our subjects ranged in age from 28-40 years and were monitored by ultrasound and steroid hormone levels. Oocyte retrieval was carried out under vaginal ultrasound-guided aspiration 32-36 hours after the onset of the LH surge. The oocyte was identified and placed in a sealed capsule containing culture media and sperm. The capsule, in a sealed cryoflex envelope, was placed in the woman's vagina and removed 42-48 hours later. The embryo was then isolated and transferred to the woman's uterus. Fifty-one retrieval cycles were attempted in 45 patients. At least one oocyte was retrieved in 88% of cycles, and fertilization was achieved in 84% of oocytes. Of the five clinical pregnancies (10%), four have delivered and one is ongoing. The cost of this procedure is approximately one-third that of standard IVF. The advantages of our method are the elimination of the use of gonadotropins, the simplicity of monitoring and oocyte retrieval, and the lack of need for expensive laboratory equipment. Natural oocyte retrieval with intravaginal fertilization may prove appropriate for those women requiring IVF who fear multiple pregnancies, have side effects from controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, or cannot afford standard IVF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1407935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Minimal stimulation with simplified monitoring for in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  J B Massey; P E Ingargiola; M J Tucker; D E Mitchell-Leef; G Wright
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  INVO procedure: minimally invasive IVF as an alternative treatment option for infertile couples.

Authors:  Elkin Lucena; Angela M Saa; Doris E Navarro; Carlos Pulido; Oscar Lombana; Abby Moran
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-02

Review 3.  Low-cost in vitro fertilization: current insights.

Authors:  Pek Joo Teoh; Abha Maheshwari
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-08-21

4.  Comparison of Treatment Outcomes among Sibling Oocytes Using Different Culture Systems-Conventional IVF versus INVOcell Device-And Evaluation of INVOcell User Satisfaction: The INVOcIVF Study.

Authors:  Wan Syahirah Yang Mohsin; Nor Shaireen Abdullah Chue; Fazilah Abdul Hamid; Muhammad Azrai Abu; Sukhilmi Othman; Norazilah Mat Jin; Shu Yuan Woon; Abdul Kadir Abdul Karim; Mohd Faizal Ahmad
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 5.  Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries.

Authors:  Willem Ombelet; Ian Cooke; Silke Dyer; Gamal Serour; Paul Devroey
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 15.610

6.  Comparing blastocyst quality and live birth rates of intravaginal culture using INVOcell™ to traditional in vitro incubation in a randomized open-label prospective controlled trial.

Authors:  Kevin J Doody; E Jason Broome; Kathleen M Doody
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Real-world experience with intravaginal culture using INVOCELL: an alternative model for infertility treatment.

Authors:  Teru Jellerette-Nolan; Amber R Cooper; Kevin J Doody; John E Nichols; John K Park; Robin L Poe-Zeigler; Andrew F Khair; Laura M Stong; Richard J Paulson; Gaurang S Daftary
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-11-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.