Literature DB >> 1407491

Right hemisphere advantage for social recognition in the chick.

G Vallortigara1.   

Abstract

Recognition of familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics was studied in pair-reared chicks tested binocularly or with only one eye in use. Chicks were tested on day 3 in pairs composed of either cagemates or strangers. Social discrimination, as measured by the ratio "number of pecks at the strangers/total number of pecks" was impaired in right-eyed chicks with respect to left-eyed and binocular chicks. Male chicks showed higher levels of social pecking than females, and chicks that used both eyes showed higher pecking than monocular chicks. There were no significant differences in the total number of pecks (i.e. pecks at companions plus pecks at strangers) between right- and left-eyed chicks: the impairment in social discrimination of right-eyed chicks seemed to be due partly to a reduction in pecking at strangers and partly to an increase in pecking at companions. It is suggested that neural structures fed by the left eye (mainly located at the right hemisphere) are better at processing and/or storing of visual information which allows recognition of individual conspecifics. This may be part of a wider tendency to respond to small changes in any of a variety of intrinsic stimulus properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1407491     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(92)90080-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  20 in total

1.  The evolution of brain lateralization: a game-theoretical analysis of population structure.

Authors:  Stefano Ghirlanda; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Wild chimpanzees show population-level handedness for tool use.

Authors:  Elizabeth V Lonsdorf; William D Hopkins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fighting and mating success in giant Australian cuttlefish is influenced by behavioural lateralization.

Authors:  Alexandra K Schnell; Christelle Jozet-Alves; Karina C Hall; Léa Radday; Roger T Hanlon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Mimicry-dependent lateralization in the visual inspection of foreign eggs by American robins.

Authors:  Hannah M Scharf; Katharine Stenstrom; Miri Dainson; Thomas J Benson; Esteban Fernandez-Juricic; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Comparative and familial analysis of handedness in great apes.

Authors:  William D Hopkins
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Sensory regulation of neuroligins and neurexin I in the honeybee brain.

Authors:  Sunita Biswas; Judith Reinhard; John Oakeshott; Robyn Russell; Mandyam V Srinivasan; Charles Claudianos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Visual laterality of calf-mother interactions in wild whales.

Authors:  Karina Karenina; Andrey Giljov; Vladimir Baranov; Ludmila Osipova; Vera Krasnova; Yegor Malashichev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Modification of social memory, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and brain asymmetry by neonatal novelty exposure.

Authors:  Akaysha C Tang; Bethany C Reeb; Russell D Romeo; Bruce S McEwen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Interpersonal competence in young adulthood and right laterality in white matter.

Authors:  Nicola De Pisapia; Mauro Serra; Paola Rigo; Justin Jager; Nico Papinutto; Gianluca Esposito; Paola Venuti; Marc H Bornstein
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 10.  The molecular neurobiology of early learning, development, and sensitive periods, with emphasis on the avian brain.

Authors:  L J Rogers
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1993 Fall-Winter       Impact factor: 5.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.