Literature DB >> 1407446

Magnetic resonance imaging of tuberculum sellae meningiomas: preventing preoperative misdiagnosis as pituitary macroadenoma.

S L Taylor1, J A Barakos, G R Harsh, C B Wilson.   

Abstract

Despite recent advances in neurodiagnostic imaging, it may be difficult to differentiate tuberculum sellae meningiomas from pituitary macroadenomas preoperatively. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has supplanted computed tomography as the imaging modality of choice for sellar and parasellar lesions, but unenhanced MR imaging does not reliably distinguish between all tuberculum sellae meningiomas and pituitary macroadenomas. Accurate differentiation between these alternative diagnoses of a suprasellar mass is important because a tuberculum sellae meningioma always requires a craniotomy, whereas a transsphenoidal route is preferred for removing most pituitary macroadenomas. The gadolinium-enhanced MR images of seven patients with tuberculum sellae meningioma and seven with pituitary macroadenoma were reviewed retrospectively. Although no specific radiological feature was pathognomonic, a combination of several features allowed the correct diagnosis in all cases. Three characteristics of tuberculum sellae meningiomas distinguish them from pituitary macroadenomas: 1) bright homogeneous enhancement with gadolinium, as opposed to heterogeneous, relatively poor enhancement; 2) a suprasellar rather than a sellar epicenter of tumor; and 3) tapered extension of an intracranial dural base. Each of these findings can be subtle, but careful examination of gadolinium-enhanced, high-quality, thin section coronal and sagittal MR images of the parasellar region for this constellation of findings will allow the correct preoperative diagnosis in patients with either of these tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1407446     DOI: 10.1227/00006123-199210000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  7 in total

Review 1.  Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia at the pituitary gland: a case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Hao-Wen Lin; Shyang-Rong Shih; Ming Yao; Tien-Shang Huang
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.943

2.  Tumors invading the cavernous sinus that cause internal carotid artery compression are rarely pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Mark E Molitch; Laura Cowen; Raymond Stadiem; Alexander Uihlein; Michelle Naidich; Eric Russell
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  Sellar meningiomas: an endocrinologic perspective.

Authors:  Matheni Sathananthan; Airani Sathananthan; Bernd W Scheithauer; Caterina Giannini; Fredric B Meyer; John L D Atkinson; Dana Erickson
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.107

4.  Intrasellar meningioma: characteristic imaging findings.

Authors:  H Satoh; K Arita; K Kurisu; M Sumida; T Nakahara; K Eguchi; K Kuroki
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Giant sellar meningioma mimicking pituitary macroadenoma.

Authors:  Jerome Rebollos Barrera; Erwin John T Carpio; Cherrie Mae Sison Pena
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-09-03

Review 6.  Meningiomas of the anterior cranial fossa floor. Review of 67 cases.

Authors:  G Rubin; U Ben David; M Gornish; Z H Rappaport
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Automatic segmentation of meningioma from non-contrasted brain MRI integrating fuzzy clustering and region growing.

Authors:  Thomas M Hsieh; Yi-Min Liu; Chun-Chih Liao; Furen Xiao; I-Jen Chiang; Jau-Min Wong
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 2.796

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.