Literature DB >> 1406621

Different chromatin structures along the spacers flanking active and inactive Xenopus rRNA genes.

R Lucchini1, J M Sogo.   

Abstract

The accessibility of DNA in chromatin to psoralen was assayed to compare the chromatin structure of the rRNA coding and spacer regions of the two related frog species Xenopus laevis and Xenopus borealis. Isolated nuclei from tissue culture cells were photoreacted with psoralen, and the extent of cross-linking in the different rDNA regions was analyzed by using a gel retardation assay. In both species, restriction fragments from the coding regions showed two distinct extents of cross-linking, indicating the presence of two types of chromatin, one that contains nucleosomes and represents the inactive gene copies, and the other one which is more cross-linked and corresponds to the transcribed genes. A similar cross-linking pattern was obtained with restriction fragments from the enhancer region. Analysis of fragments including these sequences and the upstream portions of the genes suggests that active genes are preceded by nonnucleosomal enhancer regions. The spacer regions flanking the 3' end of the genes gave different results in the two frog species. In X. borealis, all these sequences are packaged in nucleosomes, whereas in X. laevis a distinct fraction, presumably those flanking the active genes, show a heterogeneous chromatin structure. This disturbed nucleosomal organization correlates with the presence of a weaker terminator at the 3' end of the X. laevis genes compared with those of X. borealis, which allows polymerases to transcribe into the downstream spacer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1406621      PMCID: PMC360352          DOI: 10.1128/mcb.12.10.4288-4296.1992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  46 in total

1.  DNA sequences for typical ribosomal gene spacers from Xenopus laevis and Xenopus borealis.

Authors:  P Labhart; R H Reeder
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-04-24       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Visualization of nucleolar genes.

Authors:  O L Miller; B R Beatty
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-05-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Transcription of cloned eukaryotic ribosomal RNA genes.

Authors:  B Sollner-Webb; J Tower
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 23.643

4.  New procedure using a psoralen derivative for analysis of nucleosome associated DNA sequences in chromatin of living cells.

Authors:  J O Carlson; O Pfenninger; R R Sinden; J M Lehman; D E Pettijohn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1982-03-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Enhancers and ribosomal gene spacers.

Authors:  R H Reeder
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Compact structure of ribosomal chromatin in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  C Spadafora; M Crippa
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1984-03-26       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  A structural concept for nucleoli of Dictyostelium discoideum deduced from dissociation studies.

Authors:  P Labhart; E Banz; P J Ness; R W Parish; T Koller
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  DNAase I sensitivity and methylation of active versus inactive rRNA genes in xenopus species hybrids.

Authors:  D Macleod; A Bird
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  A mosaicism in the higher order structure of Xenopus oocyte nucleolar chromatin prior to and during ribosomal gene transcription.

Authors:  S C Pruitt; R M Grainger
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Drug-induced dispersal of transcribed rRNA genes and transcriptional products: immunolocalization and silver staining of different nucleolar components in rat cells treated with 5,6-dichloro-beta-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole.

Authors:  U Scheer; B Hügle; R Hazan; K M Rose
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  22 in total

1.  Transcription-coupled repair in RNA polymerase I-transcribed genes of yeast.

Authors:  Antonio Conconi; Vyacheslav A Bespalov; Michael J Smerdon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Nucleolar dominance: uniparental gene silencing on a multi-megabase scale in genetic hybrids.

Authors:  C S Pikaard
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Chromatin structure and transcription of the R1- and R2-inserted rRNA genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Junqiang Ye; Thomas H Eickbush
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  The DNA supercoiling architecture induced by the transcription factor xUBF requires three of its five HMG-boxes.

Authors:  V Y Stefanovsky; D P Bazett-Jones; G Pelletier; T Moss
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Chromatin structure and methylation of rat rRNA genes studied by formaldehyde fixation and psoralen cross-linking.

Authors:  I Stancheva; R Lucchini; T Koller; J M Sogo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Deletion of Rnt1p alters the proportion of open versus closed rRNA gene repeats in yeast.

Authors:  Mathieu Catala; Maxime Tremblay; Eric Samson; Antonio Conconi; Sherif Abou Elela
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  The role of acetylation in rDNA transcription.

Authors:  I Hirschler-Laszkiewicz; A Cavanaugh; Q Hu; J Catania; M L Avantaggiati; L I Rothblum
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Replication fork barriers in the Xenopus rDNA.

Authors:  B Wiesendanger; R Lucchini; T Koller; J M Sogo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Chromatin structure of ribosomal genes in Chironomus thummi (Diptera: Chironomidae): tissue specificity and behaviour under drug treatment.

Authors:  Cristina Sanz; Eduardo Gorab; Maria Fernanda Ruiz; José Manuel Sogo; José Luís Díez
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  S-phase-dependent action of cycloheximide in relieving chromatin-mediated general transcriptional repression.

Authors:  M Cesari; L Héliot; C Meplan; M Pabion; S Khochbin
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 3.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.