Literature DB >> 1404466

Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

E B Smith1.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with lasers or cautery is a feasible, effective, and worthwhile operative procedure that is subject to morbidity and mortality. There is unequivocal evidence that the complication incidence is directly related to the training and experience of the surgeon, applicability of basic principles of gallbladder and common duct surgery, and preventive measures toward iatrogenic injuries in gallbladder surgery. Continued and sustained investigation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, technological developments in equipment, and the continued education of the surgeon in the applicability and use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, intraoperative cholangiography, and choledocholithotomy are essential. At the St Francis Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 1009 laparoscopic cholecystectomies with lasers or cautery were performed between March 1989 and October 1991. There were 32 (3%) abandoned laparoscopic cholecystectomies with alternative open cholecystectomy. There were six extrahepatic ductal injuries and a complication incidence of 10.9%. The mortality rate was 0.38%. The average length of stay was 2 days. In comparison with standard cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a competitive and superior procedure in selected circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1404466      PMCID: PMC2571793     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  8 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A remarkable development.

Authors:  B M Wolfe; B Gardiner; C F Frey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-03-27       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: instrumentation and technique.

Authors:  E Phillips; L Daykhovsky; B Carroll; A Gershman; W S Grundfest
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1990

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: passing fancy or legitimate treatment option?

Authors:  T A Miller
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Threat or opportunity?

Authors:  R K Tompkins
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1990-10

5.  Endoscopic cholecystectomy: a new approach.

Authors:  K Matthews
Journal:  Todays OR Nurse       Date:  1990-08

6.  Electrocautery is superior to laser for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C R Voyles; A L Meena; A B Petro; A J Haick; A M Koury
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Modern standards for comparison of cholecystectomy with alternative treatments for symptomatic cholelithiasis with emphasis on long-term relief of symptoms.

Authors:  T M Gilliland; L W Traverso
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990-01

8.  Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients.

Authors:  J H Peters; E C Ellison; J T Innes; J L Liss; K E Nichols; J M Lomano; S R Roby; M E Front; L C Carey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 12.969

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Shea; M J Healey; J A Berlin; J R Clarke; P F Malet; R N Staroscik; J S Schwartz; S V Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  What should I do about my patient's gall stones?

Authors:  A R Dennison; D Azoulay; N Oakley; H Baer; J A Paraskevopoulos; G J Maddern
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.401

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.