Literature DB >> 1402863

Evaluation of different methods of catching anopheline mosquitoes in western Venezuela.

Y Rubio-Palis1, C F Curtis.   

Abstract

During a longitudinal study of vector biology and malaria transmission in western Venezuela, adult mosquitoes were collected by different methods and their efficiency was compared with human landing catches. CDC light traps, a double-net, a calf-baited trap and collection of resting mosquitoes on vegetation were tested. These methods did not prove to be effective substitutes for human landing catches.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1992        PMID： 1402863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc        ISSN： 8756-971X            Impact factor:   0.917


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of the CDC Backpack aspirator and the Prokopack aspirator for sampling indoor- and outdoor-resting mosquitoes in southern Tanzania.

Authors:  Marta F Maia; Ailie Robinson; Alex John; Joseph Mgando; Emmanuel Simfukwe; Sarah J Moore
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.876

2.  Mosquito magnet® liberty plus trap baited with octenol confirmed best candidate for Anopheles surveillance and proved promising in predicting risk of malaria transmission in French Guiana.

Authors:  Samuel B Vezenegho; Antoine Adde; Pascal Gaborit; Romuald Carinci; Jean Issaly; Vincent Pommier de Santi; Isabelle Dusfour; Sébastien Briolant; Romain Girod
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 3.  Is there an efficient trap or collection method for sampling Anopheles darlingi and other malaria vectors that can describe the essential parameters affecting transmission dynamics as effectively as human landing catches? - A Review.

Authors:  José Bento Pereira Lima; Maria Goreti Rosa-Freitas; Cynara Melo Rodovalho; Fátima Santos; Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.743

4.  MosqTent: An individual portable protective double-chamber mosquito trap for anthropophilic mosquitoes.

Authors:  José Bento Pereira Lima; Allan Kardec Ribeiro Galardo; Leonardo Soares Bastos; Arthur Weiss da Silva Lima; Maria Goreti Rosa-Freitas
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-03-09

5.  Comparison of the human-baited double net trap with the human landing catch for Aedes albopictus monitoring in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Qiang Gao; Fei Wang; Xihong Lv; Hui Cao; Jianjun Zhou; Fei Su; Chenglong Xiong; Peien Leng
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Comparative evaluation of four mosquitoes sampling methods in rice irrigation schemes of lower Moshi, northern Tanzania.

Authors:  Eliningaya J Kweka; Aneth M Mahande
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 2.979

7.  A new tent trap for sampling exophagic and endophagic members of the Anopheles gambiae complex.

Authors:  Nicodemus J Govella; Prosper P Chaki; Yvonne Geissbuhler; Khadija Kannady; Fredros Okumu; J Derek Charlwood; Robert A Anderson; Gerry F Killeen
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 2.979

8.  Updating the bionomy and geographical distribution of Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) albitarsis F: A vector of malaria parasites in northern South America.

Authors:  Miguel A Zúñiga; Yasmin Rubio-Palis; Helena Brochero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Human-Baited Double Net Trap: An Alternative to Human Landing Catches for Collecting Outdoor Biting Mosquitoes in Lao PDR.

Authors:  Julie-Anne A Tangena; Phoutmany Thammavong; Alexandra Hiscox; Steve W Lindsay; Paul T Brey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evaluation of CDC light traps for mosquito surveillance in a malaria endemic area on the Thai-Myanmar border.

Authors:  Patchara Sriwichai; Stephan Karl; Yudthana Samung; Suchada Sumruayphol; Kirakorn Kiattibutr; Anon Payakkapol; Ivo Mueller; Guiyun Yan; Liwang Cui; Jetsumon Sattabongkot
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.876
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.