Literature DB >> 14027983

Chaining and secondary reinforcement based on escape from shock.

J A DINSMOOR, M H CLAYTON.   

Abstract

Three white rats were trained to press a bar while being shocked. This produced a white noise. After 30 sec they were allowed to terminate both the shock and the noise by nosing a pigeon key. Comparison of the rates of pressing before and after the onset of the noise indicated that the noise itself was the immediate reinforcing agent for pressing. Furthermore, control tests showed that pressing was maintained only if it produced the noise: either omission of the noise or elimination of the dependency of the noise on the occurrence of the response led to a gradual abolition of pressing. When automatic termination of the shock was substituted for the key nosing requirement, however, only the key nosing extinguished. This indicated that the effectiveness of the noise as a reinforcer did not depend on its status as a discriminative stimulus for some other form of operant behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AVOIDANCE LEARNING; REINFORCEMENT LEARNING

Mesh:

Year:  1963        PMID: 14027983      PMCID: PMC1404226          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  On secondary reinforcement and shock termination.

Authors:  R C BECK
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  A wide-range, constant-current shock stimulator.

Authors:  J A DINSMOOR
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Arc suppression in shock circuits.

Authors:  J DINSMOOR
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The properties of stimuli associated with shock reduction.

Authors:  M D NEFZGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-03

5.  Escape-from-shock training in a free-response situation.

Authors:  J A DINSMOOR; L H HUGHES; Y MATSUOKA
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1958-06

6.  Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  C B FERSTER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-04

7.  A quantitative comparison of the discriminative and reinforcing functions of a stimulus.

Authors:  J A DINSMOOR
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1950-08
  7 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  ESCAPE BEHAVIOR UNDER DIFFERENT FIXED RATIOS AND SHOCK INTENSITIES.

Authors:  E WINOGRAD
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Chained schedules of avoidance: Reinforcement within and by avoidance situations.

Authors:  R J Dewaard; M Galizio; A Baron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Escape, avoidance, punishment: where do we stand?

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Actual versus potential shock in making shock situations function as negative reinforcers.

Authors:  D F Hake
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Is bar-holding with negative reinforcement preparatory or perseverative.

Authors:  J D Keehn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  A conditioned reinforcer maintained by temporal association with the termination of shock.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; M H Clayton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.