Effect of noncutting tipped instruments on the quality of root canal preparation using a modified double-flared technique.

Fifty-one extracted human first molar teeth with intact crowns and mature root apices were divided into three groups. Root curvature was determined. One of the root canals in the mesial root of lower molars, or the mesiobuccal root in maxillary molars, was prepared in one of three ways. In group 1 the root canals were instrumented using a modified double-flared technique with noncutting tipped files (Flex R); in group 2 the same files were used with a step-back technique. Group 3 was prepared with conventionally tipped files (K-Flex) using the step-back technique. A low viscosity polyvinyl siloxane impression material was injected into the prepared root canals and the specimens were decalcified, dehydrated, and cleared. The preparation was evaluated subjectively according to various desirable or undesirable criteria. A rating for overall quality of preparation was given. Statistical analysis showed that the teeth in group 1 had better overall preparation than those in group 3 (p < 0.05). There were no other statistically significant differences between the groups. The mean time required for each preparation technique was not statistically significantly different (p > 0.1). The use of a modified double-flared technique with non-cutting tipped files was shown to be an effective method for the preparation of curved root canals.