Literature DB >> 1401506

The comparison of sun protection factor values with different light sources.

T Noda1, A Kawada, M Hiruma, A Ishibashi, S Arai.   

Abstract

Sun protection factors (SPFs) were evaluated with three light sources (sunlight, a xenon arc solar simulator, and fluorescent lamps) in indoor and outdoor studies. Two types of light, UV-A+B and UV+Visible, were obtained from the solar simulator. The untanned backs of twenty-four healthy male volunteers were used as test sites. A broad spectrum sunscreen containing SPF 6, according to the manufacturer, was used. The sunscreen tested was applied at 2 mg/cm2. The actual SPF values were 4.8 with sunlight, 6.0 with UV-A+B, 4.9 with UV+Visible, and 11.8 with fluorescent lamps. There were no significant differences between the SPF values with sunlight and those with the solar simulator; the SPF value for fluorescent lamps was significantly higher. The SPF with UV-A+B of the solar simulator was similar to that with sunlight; the use of this light served to reduce pain on tested subjects. Therefore, UV-A+B from the solar simulator seems to be the most appropriate artificial light source for evaluating sunscreens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1401506     DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.1992.tb03263.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dermatol        ISSN: 0385-2407            Impact factor:   4.005


  1 in total

1.  Outdoor sunscreen testing with high-intensity solar exposure in a Chinese and Caucasian population.

Authors:  Corinne Granger; Gavin Ong; Philippe Andres; Carles Trullàs; Muzzammil Hosenally; Wei Lai; Wei Liu; Jean Krutmann; Thierry Passeron; Henry W Lim
Journal:  Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.254

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.