Literature DB >> 1400938

Male factor as determinant of in-vitro fertilization outcome.

M E Enginsu1, M H Pieters, J C Dumoulin, J L Evers, J P Geraedts.   

Abstract

The effect of different semen parameters was evaluated in 200 consecutive couples in an in-vitro fertilization (IVF) programme. All semen analyses were performed on the native aliquot of semen which was subsequently prepared and used for in-vitro insemination. Morphology evaluation using strict criteria (kappa 0.46 and r = 0.565) was compared with progressive motile sperm density (kappa 0.37 and r = 0.333) and the conventional World Health Organisation (WHO) evaluation of morphology (kappa 0.31 and r = 0.378). Results show that morphology evaluation using strict criteria is the best predictor of IVF and density of progressively motile spermatozoa can be an optional method. The combined results of strict morphology and motile concentration progressively showed that if both parameters were below the cut-off points of 5% and 3 x 10(6)/ml respectively, the fertilization rate per oocyte was very low (18%). No pregnancies were achieved in this group. When both parameters were above the cut-off points, the fertilization rate per oocyte was high (72%) (P less than 0.005) and the pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 27%. Predictive values indicate that morphology evaluation using strict criteria and the number of progressive motile spermatozoa can be used as patient selection criteria for infertility clinics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1400938     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  5 in total

1.  Very low sperm count affects the result of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  D Strassburger; S Friedler; A Raziel; M Schachter; E Kasterstein; R Ron-el
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  RS46(DXS548) genotyping of reproductive cells: approaching preimplantation testing of the fragile-X syndrome.

Authors:  J C Dreesen; J P Geraedts; J C Dumoulin; J L Evers; M H Pieters
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Fertilization, embryo quality, and cryosurvival in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Authors:  J M Moilanen; M Tulppala; I Reima; O Hovatta
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Correlation of post swim-up acrosome index with in-vitro fertilization outcomes.

Authors:  Meltem Ozguner; Oya Evirgen; Baha Oral
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 5.  Sperm Morphology Assessment in the Era of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: Reliable Results Require Focus on Standardization, Quality Control, and Training.

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Rakesh Sharma; Sajal Gupta; Renata Finelli; Neel Parekh; Manesh Kumar Panner Selvam; Ralf Henkel; Damayanthi Durairajanayagam; Camila Pompeu; Sarah Madani; Andrea Belo; Neha Singh; Simryn Covarrubias; Sara Darbandi; Raha Sadeghi; Mahsa Darbandi; Paraskevi Vogiatzi; Florence Boitrelle; Mara Simopoulou; Ramadan Saleh; Mohamed Arafa; Ahmad Majzoub; Hussein Kandil; Armand Zini; Edmund Ko; Juan G Alvarez; Marlon Martinez; Jonathan Ramsay; Sunil Jindal; Gian Maria Busetto; Hassan Sallam; Israel Maldonado; Christina Anagnostopoulou; Marco G Alves; Pallav Sengupta; Kambiz Gilany; Donald P Evenson; Sheena E M Lewis; Jaime Gosalvez; Rafael F Ambar; Rupin Shah
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 6.494

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.