Literature DB >> 13995319

Reflexive fighting in response to aversive stimulation.

R E ULRICH, N H AZRIN.   

Abstract

Reflexive fighting was elicited between paired rats as a reflex reaction to electric shock prior to any specific conditioning. Such fighting was fairly stereotyped and easily differentiated from the rats' usual behavior. The strength of this reflex was not attributable to any apparent operant reinforcement. Elicitation of fighting was a direct function of the enclosed floor area and a nonmonotonic function of the shock intensity. Failure to scramble the polarity of the electrified grid produced inconsistent fighting. Under optimal conditions fighting was consistently elicited by shock regardless of the rat's sex, strain, previous familiarity with each other, or the number present during shock. Repeated shock presentations did not produce an appreciable decrease in fighting until signs of physical debility appeared. Although shock did not cause a rat to attack inanimate objects, it did produce attack movements toward other small animals. Failure of guinea pigs to defend themselves revealed that the elicitation of fighting from the rat does not require reciprocal attack. Paired hamsters showed fighting reactions similar to those of the rats, whereas guinea pigs failed to fight. Electrode shock and a heated floor elicited fighting between the rats, but intense noise and a cooled floor did not.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AGGRESSION; CONDITIONED LEARNING

Mesh:

Year:  1962        PMID: 13995319      PMCID: PMC1404196          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  1 in total

1.  Effects of various centrally acting drugs on fighting behavior of mice.

Authors:  R E TEDESCHI; D H TEDESCHI; A MUCHA; L COOK; P A MATTIS; E J FELLOWS
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1959-01       Impact factor: 4.030

  1 in total
  58 in total

1.  The role of the catecholaminergic system in footshock-induced fighting in mice.

Authors:  Z Roliński; W Kozak
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Effects of morphine withdrawal on food competition hierarchies and fighting behavior in rats.

Authors:  V F Gellert; S B Sparber
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-01-31       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Effects of previous housing conditions on shock-induced aggression.

Authors:  T L Creer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  On the status of knowledge for using punishment implications for treating behavior disorders.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Christina M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

5.  EFFECT OF SHOCK DURATION ON SHOCK-INDUCED FIGHTING.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; R E ULRICH; R R HUTCHINSON; D G NORMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  PAIN-AGGRESSION TOWARD INANIMATE OBJECTS.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; R R HUTCHINSON; R D SALLERY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  PAIN-INDUCED FIGHTING IN THE SQUIRREL MONKEY.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; R R HUTCHINSON; D F HAKE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  ELICITATION OF AGGRESSION BY A PHYSICAL BLOW.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; D F HAKE; R R HUTCHINSON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Some comments on the distinction between intention and intentionality.

Authors:  Paul Neuman
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2007

10.  Observational learning from a radical-behavioristic viewpoint.

Authors:  H Deguchi
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1984
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.