Literature DB >> 1397910

Accuracy of assessment of the extent of examination by experienced colonoscopists.

M L Anderson1, R I Heigh, G A McCoy, K Parent, J R Muhm, G S McKee, W G Eversman, J M Collins.   

Abstract

One hundred colonoscopies were done. The colonoscopist noted whether the cecum had been intubated as well as the markers used to make this determination. With the colonoscope in position at maximum penetration, a radiologist independently determined its position using fluoroscopy, with a contrast agent delivered through the colonoscope. The cecum was entered in 86 of 100 cases. The tip of the colonoscope was at the level of the ileocecal valve in nine additional cases; the colonoscopist judged that the cecum was well seen in five of these nine. In one case, the colonoscopist overestimated the extent of the examination when transillumination in the right lower quadrant was the only confirming marker. When the more reliable markers (ileocecal valve, appendiceal orifice, converging indentations of the taenia coli in the cecal pole) were seen, no errors were made. Experienced colonoscopists are accurate in assessing the extent of colonoscopy and fluoroscopic confirmation is not routinely needed. When reliable markers are not seen during the examination, a barium enema, preferably with air contrast, should be done.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1397910     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(92)70516-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  9 in total

1.  Principles of privileging and credentialing for endoscopy and colonoscopy.

Authors:  S D Wexner; G M Eisen; C Simmang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Current status of CT colonography.

Authors:  Suzanne M Frentz; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test.

Authors:  Lapo Sali; Massimo Falchini; Andrea-Giovanni Bonanomi; Guido Castiglione; Stefano Ciatto; Paola Mantellini; Francesco Mungai; Ilario Menchi; Natale Villari; Mario Mascalchi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Granting of privilege for gastrointestinal endoscopy : This privilege guideline was reviewed and approved by the Board of Governors of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), September 2007. It was prepared by the SAGES Guidelines Committee.

Authors:  Yumi Hori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Gastroenterology--II: Small and large bowel, pancreas and biliary system.

Authors:  M C Bateson
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Incomplete colonoscopy: maximizing completion rates of gastroenterologists.

Authors:  Mayur Brahmania; Jei Park; Sigrid Svarta; Jessica Tong; Ricky Kwok; Robert Enns
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 7.  Computed tomography colonography in 2014: an update on technique and indications.

Authors:  Andrea Laghi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Body mass index & low CIR in colonoscopy!

Authors:  Adnan Qureshi; Saira BiBi; Ravi Madhotra
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2018

Review 9.  Application of artificial intelligence-driven endoscopic screening and diagnosis of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yu-Jer Hsiao; Yuan-Chih Wen; Wei-Yi Lai; Yi-Ying Lin; Yi-Ping Yang; Yueh Chien; Aliaksandr A Yarmishyn; De-Kuang Hwang; Tai-Chi Lin; Yun-Chia Chang; Ting-Yi Lin; Kao-Jung Chang; Shih-Hwa Chiou; Ying-Chun Jheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.