Literature DB >> 13968320

Immobility as an avoidance response, and its disruption by drugs.

D BINDRA, H ANCHEL.   

Abstract

Much of the available literature on avoidance behavior is based on responses which require the animal to run, lever-press, or to make some active response to avoid noxious stimulation. The purpose of Experiment I reported in this paper was to determine whether animals can learn to sit or stand motionless in order to escape or avoid electric shock. Five experimental rats were given escape-avoidance training, while five yoked control animals received electric shocks without any response-related contingency. It was shown that an immobility avoidance response, as distinct from the unconditioned "freezing" response to shock, can be trained. The results of Experiment II (30 rats) revealed that this response is more readily acquired at higher shock intensities than at lower ones, provided escape by jumping is prevented at the high shock intensities. The effects of six doses of each of three drugs on the immobility avoidance response were studied in Experiment III (13 rats). Methylphenidate, chlorpromazine, and imipramine all produced a decrement in the immobility response, but the pattern and amount of the effects of the three drugs were quite different, one from the other. The implications of these findings for a general theory of avoidance behavior and for drug screening are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AVOIDANCE LEARNING; CHLORPROMAZINE; IMIPRAMINE; LOCOMOTION; METHYLPHENIDATE

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1963        PMID: 13968320      PMCID: PMC1404299          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  Tranquilizers and antidepressants: a pharmacological comparison.

Authors:  F HERR; J STEWART; M P CHAREST
Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther       Date:  1961-12-01

2.  Correlation in rats between the locomotor and avoidance suppressant potencies of eight phenothiazine tranquilizers.

Authors:  S IRWIN
Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther       Date:  1961-07-01

3.  Effects of methylphenidylacetate and chlorpromazine on certain components of general activity.

Authors:  D BINDRA; D BARAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The treatment of depressive states with G 22355 (imipramine hydrochloride).

Authors:  R KUHN
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1958-11       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  Effects of LSD-25 and amphetamine on a running response in the rat.

Authors:  C L HAMILTON
Journal:  AMA Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1960-01

6.  The effect of chlorpromazine on fear-motivated behavior in rats.

Authors:  R E MILLER; J V MURPHY; I A MIRSKY
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1957-07       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Behavioral effects of some psychopharmacological agents.

Authors:  L COOK; E WEIDLEY
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1957-03-14       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  New test for tranquilizers.

Authors:  D S BLOUGH
Journal:  Science       Date:  1958-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Effects of chlorpromazine on the acquisition and extinction of an avoidance response in the rat.

Authors:  R ADER; D W CLINK
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1957-09       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  A time-sample method for measuring general activity and its components.

Authors:  D BINDRA; J BLOND
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1958-06
  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  AN ELECTRONIC APPARATUS FOR RECORDING MOVEMENT IN SMALL ANIMALS.

Authors:  W J MCCLELLAND
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Avoidance conditioning in bamboo sharks (Chiloscyllium griseum and C. punctatum): behavioral and neuroanatomical aspects.

Authors:  Susanne Schwarze; Horst Bleckmann; Vera Schluessel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Intra-amygdala muscimol injections impair freezing and place avoidance in aversive contextual conditioning.

Authors:  Matthew R Holahan; Norman M White
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  The hyperactive spontaneously hypertensive rat learns to sit still, but not to stop bursts of responses with short interresponse times.

Authors:  B Wultz; T Sagvolden
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.805

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.