Literature DB >> 1395638

Foot and eye preferences in adults: relationship with handedness, sex and age.

C Dargent-Paré1, M De Agostini, M Mesbah, G Dellatolas.   

Abstract

Age, sex, and handedness effects in foot and eye preferences were studied by questionnaire in large samples of normal adult populations from five different countries (total sample, n = 5064). Foot and eye preference were significantly associated with handedness category (right or left) in all the 10 sex by country samples for foot, and in 9/10 samples for eye. The overall frequencies of crossed preferences were 5% between hand and foot and 19.5% between hand and eye. In right-handers, a gradual shift toward the "right" with increasing age was systematically observed, both for footedness and eyedness. The proportion of crossed hand-foot preference was higher in men than women (7.4% vs 2.5%), and higher in left-handers than right-handers (16.3% vs 4.1%). Sex differences in the proportion of crossed hand-eye preference were variable from one country to the other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1395638     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80144-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  6 in total

1.  The occurrence of ipsilateral or contralateral foot disorders and hand dominance: the Framingham foot study.

Authors:  Uyen-Sa D T Nguyen; Alyssa B Dufour; Rock G Positano; Joshua S Dines; Christopher C Dodson; David G Gagnon; Howard J Hillstrom; Marian T Hannan
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb

2.  Consistency of leg extension power assessments in older men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study.

Authors:  Terri Blackwell; Peggy M Cawthon; Lynn M Marshall; Richard Brand
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  Normal values for segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Maria Laura Avila; Leigh C Ward; Brian M Feldman; Madeline I Montoya; Jennifer Stinson; Alex Kiss; Leonardo R Brandão
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of the type and direction of support surface perturbation on postural responses.

Authors:  Chiung-Ling Chen; Shu-Zon Lou; Hong-Wen Wu; Shyi-Kuen Wu; Kwok-Tak Yeung; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Leg dominance as a risk factor for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Matthew T Philippi; Timothy L Kahn; Temitope F Adeyemi; Travis G Maak; Stephen K Aoki
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2020-02-13

6.  Four meta-analyses across 164 studies on atypical footedness prevalence and its relation to handedness.

Authors:  Julian Packheiser; Judith Schmitz; Gesa Berretz; David P Carey; Silvia Paracchini; Marietta Papadatou-Pastou; Sebastian Ocklenburg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.