| Literature DB >> 1395422 |
D Lanigan1, E Jurriaans, J C Hammonds, I P Wells, R G Choa.
Abstract
The current role of renal embolization in carcinoma of the kidney is uncertain. In order to assess surgeons' opinion of its usefulness a questionnaire was circulated to all general urologists practising in Britain and Ireland. Also, a series of cases in which the technique was employed (n = 35) was reviewed and compared with a similar group who were not embolized (n = 40). There was a 71% response to the survey. The principal findings were that all but five urologists believe that embolization should not be used routinely in the management of renal cell carcinoma. Thirty-five per cent stated that they felt it has a role in management of symptoms in metastatic or inoperable tumours. The review of both series of patients in our unit shows that embolization (using 95% ethanol infused via a balloon occlusion catheter) did not reduce peroperative blood loss and did significantly increase hospital stay. There were no deaths in this series, and morbidity was confined to 'post-embolization syndrome' in 16 cases. We believe that in those cases where embolization is indicated, alcohol infusion via a balloon occlusion catheter is a safe and efficient method.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1992 PMID: 1395422 DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)80440-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Radiol ISSN: 0009-9260 Impact factor: 2.350