Literature DB >> 1394123

Cathepsin D as a prognostic indicator for node-negative breast cancer patients using both immunoassays and enzymatic assays.

T E Kute1, Z M Shao, N K Sugg, R T Long, G B Russell, L D Case.   

Abstract

This is a retrospective study on 162 node-negative patients, with both biochemical and clinical factors being measured for determination of prognostic markers. Steroid receptors were measured on all tumors, while tumor size, histological grade, ploidy status, and cell cycle kinetics indicators could not be found or measured on 25 or less of the patient group. The primary focus of this study was the measurement of cathepsin D, analyzed by two different procedures, and 161 of the 162 patients had at least one value. The antigenic assay was performed using the US-CIS kit, and it was sensitive and reproducible. A biochemical assay using the enzymatic activity of cathepsin D was developed, and it gave proportional values, compared to the antigenic assay values (r2 = 0.79). Our results indicated that the mean antigenic levels were 20% higher than the biochemical assay levels (P = 0.001). High levels of cathepsin D by the antigenic assay predicted poor relapse-free (P = 0.0001) and overall (P = 0.0004) survival. High levels of cathepsin D by the biochemical assay also predicted poor relapse-free (P = 0.031) and overall (P = 0.0013) survival. The cathepsin D values were still useful as predictors of outcome after multivariate analysis. Several other factors, such as grade and S phase, were useful as additional prognostic indicators. In conclusion, cathepsin D is the most useful marker in node-negative patients, and the analysis can be performed by both a biochemical and an antigenic assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1394123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  19 in total

1.  Clarithromycin delays progression of bronchial epithelial cells from G1 phase to S phase and delays cell growth via extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase suppression.

Authors:  Masaharu Shinkai; Jun Tamaoki; Hideo Kobayashi; Soichiro Kanoh; Kazuo Motoyoshi; Tim Kute; Bruce K Rubin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Response to P.M. Ravdin (BCRT 24:219-226, 1993), "Evaluation of Cathepsin D as a Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer".

Authors:  H Rochefort; S Thorpe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Prognostic value of cathepsin D in breast cancer: comparison of immunohistochemical and immunoradiometric detection methods.

Authors:  U J Göhring; A Scharl; U Thelen; A Ahr; G Crombach; B R Titius
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  The Expression of Lysosomal Proteinases and Their Inhibitors in Breast Cancer: Possible Relationship to Prognosis of the Disease.

Authors:  Tamara T Lah; Janko Kos; Andrej Blejec; Snezana Frkovic-Georgio; Rastko Golouh
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  Western blotting and isoform analysis of cathepsin D from normal and malignant human breast cell lines.

Authors:  L D Laury-Kleintop; E C Coronel; M K Lange; T Tachovsky; S Longo; S Tucker; J A Alhadeff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Quantitative immunohistochemical determination of cathepsin-D and its relation with other variables.

Authors:  S Veneroni; M G Daidone; G Di Fronzo; V Cappelletti; D Amadori; A Riccobon; A Paradiso; M Correale; R Silvestrini
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Evaluation of cathepsin D as a prognostic factor in breast cancer.

Authors:  P M Ravdin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Mitogenic function of human procathepsin D: the role of the propeptide.

Authors:  M Fusek; V Vetvicka
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1994-11-01       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Tumor angiogenesis in node-negative breast carcinomas--relationship with epidermal growth factor receptor, estrogen receptor, and survival.

Authors:  S B Fox; R D Leek; K Smith; J Hollyer; M Greenall; A L Harris
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  Membrane proteases as potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets for breast malignancy.

Authors:  W T Chen; C C Lee; L Goldstein; S Bernier; C H Liu; C Y Lin; Y Yeh; W L Monsky; T Kelly; M Dai
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.