Literature DB >> 13935675

Experimental self-punishment and superstitious escape behavior.

B MIGLER.   

Abstract

Rats were trained to escape from shock by pressing a bar. Bar holding was subsequently punished with very brief shocks. This treatment failed to depress bar-holding behavior. In some cases, although the escape shocks were delivered very infrequently, bar holding was maintained and resulted in the delivery of several thousand punishments per session. These and other effects of the punishment treatment were investigated. Finally, some of the possibilities of superstitious escape responding were explored by presenting inescapable shocks to rats that had been trained to escape shock by lever pressing. Although responding during these shocks had no programmed consequences, responding was sustained.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AVOIDANCE LEARNING; PUNISHMENT

Mesh:

Year:  1963        PMID: 13935675      PMCID: PMC1404464          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  1 in total

1.  Bar holding during escape conditioning.

Authors:  B MIGLER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  1 in total
  7 in total

1.  SUPERSTITIOUS ESCAPE BEHAVIOR DURING SIDMAN AVOIDANCE TRAINING.

Authors:  J D KEEHN; S CHAUDREY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  A review of reinforcement control procedures.

Authors:  Rachel H Thompson; Brian A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

3.  The effects of escape conditioning and shock intensity on responding during inescapable shock.

Authors:  M P Domjan; J W Rowell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Some variables affecting the superstitious chaining of responses.

Authors:  J J Boren
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The discriminative control of free-operant avoidance despite exposure to shock during the stimulus correlated with nonreinforcement.

Authors:  P J Bersh; J V Lambert
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Persistent shock-elicited responding engendered by a negative-reinforcement procedure.

Authors:  R W Powell; S Peck
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Double discrimination avoidance with a single stimulus.

Authors:  J D Keehn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.