Literature DB >> 139356

Comparative in vivo mutagenicity testing by SCE and micronucleus induction in mouse bone marrow.

T Bauknecht, W Vogel, U Bayer, D Wild.   

Abstract

The treatment of mice with repeated injections of BUdR and FUdR allows for the demonstration of differentially stained metaphases from bone marrow after FPG (fluorescence plus Giemsa; Perry and Wolff, 1974) treatment. Thus, it is possible to determine the number of SCE's under in vivo conditions, which appears as a very promising system for mutagenicity testing. We studied the response of this system in comparison to the micronucleus test using six mutagenic agents: triaziquone, cyclophosphamide (CP), dimethylphenyltriazene (PDMT), methylnitronitrosoguandine (MNNG), dimethylnitrosamine (DMNA), and diethylnitrosamine (DENA). With the exception of MNNG and DENA, all these agents induce both, SCE and micronuclei, MNNG and and DENA being ineffective in both systems. The most potent SCE-inducing agent was triaziquone, followed by PDMT, CP, and DMNA. The quantitative comparison indicates that SCE are induced at 1/10-1/100 of the concentrations which are required for the detection of micronuclei.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 139356     DOI: 10.1007/bf00446622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  21 in total

1.  Mutagenicity studies in microorganisms in vitro, with extracts of mammalian organs, and with the host-mediated-assay.

Authors:  G Mohn; J Ellenberger; D McGregor; H J Merker
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Micronuclei in mouse bone-marrow cells. A simple in vivo model for the evaluation of drug-induced chromosomal aberrations.

Authors:  B E Matter; J Grauwiler
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Microfluorometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  S A Latt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sister chromatid exchanges induced in Chinese hamster cells by UV irradiation of different stages of the cell cycle: the necessity for cells to pass through S.

Authors:  S Wolff; J Bodycote; R B Painter
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  The micronucleus test.

Authors:  W Schmid
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Structure-activity dependence in some novel ring-substituted 3,3-dimethyl-1-phenyltriazenes. Genetic effects in Drosophila melanogaster and in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a direct and a host-mediated assay.

Authors:  G F Kolar; R Fahrig; E Vogel
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 5.192

7.  Giemsa technique for the detection of sister chromatid exchanges.

Authors:  J R Korenberg; E F Freedlender
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  [Chromatid exchanges in human mitotic cells. BUDR Treatment and bichromatic fluorescence by aridine orange (author's transl)].

Authors:  B Dutrillauz; A M Fosse; M Prieur; J Lejeune
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  DNA replication patterns of human chromosomes from fibroblasts and amniotic fluid cells revealed by a Giemsa staining technique.

Authors:  J T Epplen; J W Siebers; W Vogel
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1975

10.  Sister chromatid exchange in human chromosomes from normal individuals and patients with ataxia telangiectasia.

Authors:  S M Galloway; H J Evans
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1975
View more
  8 in total

1.  Sister chromatid exchange in lymphocytes from patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  M Otter; C G Palmer; R L Baehner
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  In vivo sister chromatid exchange in cells of various organs of the mouse.

Authors:  N Kanda; H Kato
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1979-10-01       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Sister chromatid exchange in lymphocytes from patients with malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  K Kurvink; C D Bloomfield; K M Keenan; S Levitt; J Cervenka
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1978-10-31       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and structural chromosome aberration in mutagenicity testing.

Authors:  E Gebhart
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Chromosome studies on lymphocytes of patients under cytostatic therapy. II. Studies Using the BUDR-labelling technique in cytostatic interval therapy.

Authors:  E Gebhart; B Windolph; F Wopfner
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Cytogenetic effects of paraoxon and methyl-parathion on cultured human lymphocytes: SCE, clastogenic activity and cell cycle delay.

Authors:  S Singh; B Lehmann-Grube; H W Goedde
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Cytogenetic effects of low-level exposure to toluene, xylene, and their mixture on human blood lymphocytes.

Authors:  C L Richer; S Chakrabarti; M Senécal-Quevillon; M A Duhr; X X Zhang; R Tardif
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Effects of various cyclophosphamide concentrations in vivo on sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) and chromosome aberrations of Chinese hamster bone marrow cells: comparison of two methods measuring the mutagenicity of a test compound.

Authors:  G Roszinsky-Köcher; G Röhrborn
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1979-01-19       Impact factor: 4.132

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.