Literature DB >> 1393479

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a routine procedure for gallstones: results of an 'all-comers' policy.

I G Martin1, P J Holdsworth, J Asker, B Baltas, M T Glinatsis, H Sue-Ling, J Gibson, D Johnston, M J McMahon.   

Abstract

A total of 165 consecutive patients with gallstones were considered for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Three were excluded. The median age was 52 years and 76 per cent were women. Eighteen patients underwent urgent operation. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successful in 160 of the 162 patients (99 per cent). The two failures were the result of dense adhesions and stones in the bile duct. There were no deaths but major complications occurred in three patients: fenestration of the colon sutured laparoscopically; bleeding from a cannulation site and subsequent laparotomy for a strangulated hernia; and subphrenic abscess. There were 13 minor complications, but no bile duct injuries or peritonitis. The median postoperative hospital stay was 1 day. Bile duct stones were present in 14 patients (9 per cent) and were removed by endoscopic sphincterotomy (11 patients), by laparoscopic exploration of the common duct (two) and by conversion to laparotomy (one). These results suggest that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is applicable to the large majority of patients who require elective or urgent cholecystectomy, if appropriate radiological and endoscopic support is available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1393479     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800790833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  18 in total

1.  Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: preoperative prediction of duration of surgery.

Authors:  B J Ammori; M Larvin; M J McMahon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pregnancy. A safe option during the second trimester?

Authors:  I G Martin; S P Dexter; M J McMahon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A systematic review of the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A L Widdison
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Liver retraction techniques for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  W G Ainslie; M Larvin; I G Martin; M J McMahon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Bile leakage following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J L Albasini; V S Aledo; S P Dexter; J Marton; I G Martin; M J McMahon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Open cholecystectomy in the age of the laparoscope.

Authors:  A L Widdison; S Norton; C P Armstrong
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Multivariate comparison of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G R Jatzko; P H Lisborg; A M Pertl; H M Stettner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Leicester: an audit of 555 patients.

Authors:  I Birdi; T M Hunt; P S Veitch; M Armon; P Jervis; C Barr
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  G G Jamieson; D I Watson; R Britten-Jones; P C Mitchell; M Anvari
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  I G Martin; S P Dexter; J Marton; J Gibson; J Asker; A Firullo; M J McMahon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.