Literature DB >> 1393203

The Takeda Model UA-751 blood pressure and pulse rate monitor.

D W Harrison1, W D Crews.   

Abstract

The performance of the Takeda Model UA-751 oscillometric blood pressure and pulse rate monitor was compared with readings taken using auscultatory technique and the mercury manometer. Significant correlations (p less than 0.0001) were found between the clinical standard and the UA-751 on measurements of systolic (r = 0.85) and diastolic (r = 0.77) blood pressure. Comparison of the pulse rate measurements obtained using the Grass Polygraph with those of the UA-751 resulted in a reliable correlation (r = 0.98; p less than 0.0001), as well. The results provide empirical support for the validity of the UA-751 under controlled laboratory conditions. However, the results suggest heightened error in the measurement of systolic pressure when the UA-751 is used by individuals who have high blood pressures.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1393203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Instrum Technol        ISSN: 0899-8205


  4 in total

1.  Pressure for change: unresolved issues in blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  M Aylett
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a guide for general practitioners.

Authors:  N Prasad; C Isles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-12-14

3.  Clinical evaluation of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor in adults and children based on the 1992 AAMI SP-10 standards.

Authors:  J Ling; Y Ohara; Y Orime; G P Noon; S Takatani
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1995-03

4.  Home blood pressure monitoring: its effect on the management of hypertension in general practice.

Authors:  M Aylett; G Marples; K Jones
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.386

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.