Literature DB >> 1387604

Effects of ipratropium bromide nebulizer solution with and without preservatives in the treatment of acute and stable asthma.

D H Bryant1, P Rogers.   

Abstract

In a recent study, it was suggested that the preservatives in ipratropium bromide nebulizer solution may cause a paradoxic bronchoconstrictor response in 20 percent or more of patients with stable asthma. The frequency of this response in patients with acute asthma is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the acute effects of the usual dose of nebulized ipratropium bromide (0.25 mg) in patients with either stable or acute asthma using formulations with and without added preservatives. Twenty-five patients with stable asthma and 25 patients with acute asthma were studied. Each subject was given preservative-containing ipratropium bromide, preservative-free ipratropium bromide, pH 7 preservative-free ipratropium bromide, and saline solution in random order using a double-blind crossover technique with at least 4 h between drug administrations. Very frequent measurements of FEV1 were made for 30 min after each drug administration and then 5 mg of albuterol was nebulized and the FEV1 was measured again after another 30 min. Changes in FEV1 were expressed as a percentage of the predicted FEV1. Paradoxic bronchoconstriction to ipratropium was detected in only one patient with acute asthma (12 percent fall in FEV1) but in none of the patients with stable asthma. A 6 percent fall in FEV1 change occurred with the saline solution in this subject suggesting that the response may have been a nonspecific one due to increased bronchial responsiveness. The mean response (+/- 1 SD) to albuterol plus either preservative-containing ipratropium, preservative-free ipratropium, or pH7 preservative-free ipratropium was significantly greater (p less than 0.05) than the response to albuterol alone both in the patients with acute asthma (25 +/- 12 percent, 27 +/- 15 percent, 26 +/- 15 percent, and 20 +/- 15 percent, respectively) and stable asthma (26 +/- 7 percent, 25 +/- 8 percent, 24 +/- 6 percent, and 22 +/- 9 percent) supporting the use of ipratropium bromide as an additional bronchodilator in patients with asthma who do not show a satisfactory response to nebulized beta-adrenergic agonist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1387604     DOI: 10.1378/chest.102.3.742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  4 in total

Review 1.  Discharge of the asthmatic patient.

Authors:  B A Markoff; J F MacMillan; V Kumra
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 2.  Guidelines for the emergency management of asthma in adults. CAEP/CTS Asthma Advisory Committee. Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians and the Canadian Thoracic Society.

Authors:  R C Beveridge; A F Grunfeld; R V Hodder; P R Verbeek
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  How long should Atrovent be given in acute asthma?

Authors:  C Brophy; B Ahmed; S Bayston; A Arnold; D McGivern; M Greenstone
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 4.  Anticholinergic agents for chronic asthma in adults.

Authors:  M Westby; M Benson; P Gibson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.