Literature DB >> 13833748

A report on the laboratory assays carried out at the Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine on the typhoid vaccines used in the field study in Yugoslavia.

A F STANDFAST.   

Abstract

The results of the laboratory assays of the Yugoslav typhoid vaccines used in the field trials at Osijek are disappointing when compared with the results of the field trials.The tests carried out at the Lister Institute in England, the Central Institute of Hygiene in Zagreb, Yugoslavia, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in the USA indicate that, except for the agglutination tests for H antigen, there is little or no demonstrable difference in the potency of the two Yugoslav vaccines in either active immunization tests or passive protection tests.Although only a relatively small number of assays were carried out using the intracerebral route of challenge, the results indicate that there is no advantage in this method over the more usual intraperitoneal route. Since there was a difference between the potency of the vaccines in the field trails, it must be concluded that the mouse is not a suitable animal for typhoid assay or that the proper way of testing the mouse has not yet been found. The great variation in detail in nominally identical tests made in different laboratories and the differences in the results emphasizes the essential importance of at least one common assay, identical in detail between collaborating laboratories, in a study of this kind.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TYPHOID/immunology; VACCINES/chemistry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1960        PMID: 13833748      PMCID: PMC2555307     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  2 in total

1.  Laboratory tests of typhoid vaccines used in a controlled field study.

Authors:  G EDSALL; M C CARLSON; S B FORMAL; A S BENENSON
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1959       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  The comparison between field trials and mouse protection tests against intranasal and intracerebral challenges with Bordetella pertussis.

Authors:  A F STANDFAST
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 7.397

  2 in total
  12 in total

1.  THE PRESENT STATUS OF FIELD AND LABORATORY STUDIES OF TYPHOID AND PARATYPHOID VACCINES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO STUDIES SPONSORED BY WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION.

Authors:  B CVJETANOVIC; K UEMURA
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1965       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  H antigen of Salmonella typhosa.

Authors:  J G TULLY; S GAINES
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1961-06       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Chrome typhoid vaccine.

Authors:  E E Vella
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1963-03

4.  The effects of humoral, cellular and non-specific immunity on intracerebral Bordetella pertussis infections in mice.

Authors:  J M Dolby; D E Dolby; C J Bronne-Shanbury
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1975-02

5.  A contribution to the laboratory assay of typhoid vaccines.

Authors:  K RASKA; D MATEJOVSKA; J JELINEK
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1962       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  [Investigations on the evaluation of typhoid vaccines tested in British Guiana and Yugoslavia].

Authors:  I Joó; Z Pusztai; V P Juhász
Journal:  Z Hyg Infektionskr       Date:  1965

7.  Laboratory assays of different types of field trial typhoid vaccines and relationship to efficacy in man.

Authors:  M Pittman; H J Bohner
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Assessment of typhoid vaccines by using the intraperitoneal route of challenge.

Authors:  P B Carter; F M Collins
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  INTERNATIONAL REFERENCE PREPARATIONS OF TYPHOID VACCINE. A REPORT ON INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIVE LABORATORY STUDIES.

Authors:  J SPAUN; K UEMURA
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1964       Impact factor: 9.408

10.  Laboratory characteristics of paratyphoid B vaccines tested in controlled field trials.

Authors:  L B Hejfec; L A Levina
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.