Facts and fallacies about gonorrhea and syphilis.

The limitations and special usefulness of clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of gonorrhea are poorly understood and utilized by the average practitioner today. Most physicians and clinics, lulled by complacency or lack of ancillary aid in the area of diagnosis, proceed by measures based in many instances upon past fallacy rather than upon the facts recently developed by research in this disease. The same circumstances apply concerning treatment and management of this disease, particularly in females. All physicians are potentially capable of giving excellent treatment for syphilis today. The problem is to properly diagnose the disease, manage the patient and deal with the source. Looming large in the area of diagnosis is the interpretation of serologic tests for syphilis. No serologic test diagnoses syphilis, but rather gives information as to the immunologic status of the the patient in relation to reagin and treponemal antibodies. None of the antibodies measured in these tests are absolutely specific for syphilis alone. There is no substitute for a well-informed physician, who knows his patient, to relate and interpret even the best of treponemal serologic tests.