Literature DB >> 1382476

Comparison of pregnancy rates following gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) under general anesthesia with thiopental sodium or propofol.

E T Pierce1, M Smalky, M M Alper, J A Hunter, R L Amrhein, E C Pierce.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the pregnancy rate for gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) patients who received thiopental sodium was different from the pregnancy rate for patients who received propofol for the induction of general anesthesia.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of clinical records.
SETTING: Private outpatient infertility clinic. PATIENTS: Two hundred eighty-two consecutive GIFT procedures performed on 230 patients with infertility. INTERVENTION: Patients undergoing GIFT were divided into two groups on the basis of whether they received thiopental or propofol for induction of anesthesia.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical pregnancy following each GIFT procedure was assessed by multiple-serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin and ultrasound determinations. The pregnancy rates of 24.6% and 25.8% for the thiopental and propofol groups, respectively, were not significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: The pregnancy rate following GIFT for patients given propofol for induction of general anesthesia did not differ from that for patients given thiopental.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1382476     DOI: 10.1016/0952-8180(92)90164-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  3 in total

1.  Anesthesia practices in the United States common to in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers.

Authors:  E C Ditkoff; J Plumb; A Selick; M V Sauer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Propofol. An update of its use in anaesthesia and conscious sedation.

Authors:  H M Bryson; B R Fulton; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Propofol or Thiopental sodium in patients undergoing reproductive assisted technologies: Differences in hemodynamic recovery and outcome of oocyte retrieval: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mohammad Hossein Jarahzadeh; Reza Jouya; Fatemeh Sadat Mousavi; Mohammad Dehghan-Tezerjani; Shekoofa Behdad; Hamid Reza Soltani
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.