Literature DB >> 1380914

Cerebello-frontal cortical projections in humans studied with the magnetic coil.

V E Amassian1, R Q Cracco, P J Maccabee, J B Cracco.   

Abstract

Focal stimulation over human cerebellum with a figure 8 magnetic coil (MC) results in an evoked wave recorded from bipolar scalp electrodes on the interaural line and more anteriorly. In 3 subjects, the wave responses along the interaural line had latencies of 8.8-13.8 msec, lasted 17.4-29.0 msec and had a maximum amplitude of 14.4-26.8 microV. The responses were recorded more anteriorly from leads midway between the interaural line and frontal leads; responses recorded from frontal leads were up to 3.5 msec later. The evoked wave was preceded by a diphasic EMG response with a latency of 1.2-2.0 msec. Analysis of the averaged responses recorded by adjoining bipolar leads indicated that the response was predominantly surface positive and crossed. Control experiments eliminated eye movement and somatosensory input as explanations of the evoked response, thereby identifying it as a cortical response. The surface positive wave in humans was compared with the responses recorded in cat and monkey to cerebellar stimulation. The responses in humans could reflect dysfacilitation through MC activation of Purkinje cells, or feed-forward facilitation through transsynaptic or antidromic activation of dentate neurons. The latency of the surface positive wave exceeds that of cerebellar inhibition of MC elicited hand muscle responses, but the discrepancy is at least partly accounted for by the extra delay required to set up the indirect cortico-spinal component required for motoneuron discharge. Estimates made of the cerebello-frontal cortical and peripheral feedback loop times suggest that the central has less than one quarter the delay of the peripheral loop, which would be especially advantageous during fast skilled movements of the fingers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1380914     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90115-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  14 in total

1.  Instrumentation for the measurement of electric brain responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  J Virtanen; J Ruohonen; R Näätänen; R J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Assessing cortical network properties using TMS-EEG.

Authors:  Nigel C Rogasch; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation during positron emission tomography: a new method for studying connectivity of the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  T Paus; R Jech; C J Thompson; R Comeau; T Peters; A C Evans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in Alzheimer's disease: a neurophysiological marker of cortical hyperexcitability.

Authors:  Giovanni Pennisi; Raffaele Ferri; Giuseppe Lanza; Mariagiovanna Cantone; Manuela Pennisi; Valentina Puglisi; Giulia Malaguarnera; Rita Bella
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  An additional source of potentials recorded from the scalp following magnetic stimulation over the lower occiput and adjoining neck.

Authors:  J C Rothwell; K J Werhahn; V E Amassian
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Scalp potentials recorded over the sensorimotor region following magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum in man: considerations about the activated structures and their potential diagnostic use.

Authors:  B U Meyer; S Röricht
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Deficits of cortical oculomotor mechanisms in cerebellar atrophy patients.

Authors:  F Filippopulos; T Eggert; A Straube
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Using simultaneous repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (rTMS/fNIRS) to measure brain activation and connectivity.

Authors:  F Andrew Kozel; Fenghua Tian; Sameer Dhamne; Paul E Croarkin; Shawn M McClintock; Alan Elliott; Kimberly S Mapes; Mustafa M Husain; Hanli Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Treatment pulse application for magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Sun-Seob Choi; Whi-Young Kim
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-06-12

10.  Methodology for combined TMS and EEG.

Authors:  Risto J Ilmoniemi; Dubravko Kicić
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.