Literature DB >> 1380884

Pain control. Barriers to the use of available information. World Health Organization Expert Committee on Cancer Pain Relief and Active Supportive Care.

M McCaffery1.   

Abstract

One of the World Health Organization's (WHO) top priorities is cancer pain relief. Simple guidelines for assessing and relieving pain have been developed, published, and field tested. WHO has concluded that there is enough knowledge currently to permit an approach to cancer pain relief that can be implemented on a worldwide basis. This information, when used correctly, allows pain control in 75% or more of patients with cancer pain. However, numerous barriers prevent the application of this knowledge and the achievement of cancer pain relief. Assessing the patient's cancer pain and effective use of analgesic drugs, especially opioid agents, are hampered by a lack of education of health-care professionals and the fact that the pain sensation is entirely subjective. Unfortunately, these factors often result in pain management being determined on the basis of personal opinion rather than scientific knowledge. This leads to inconsistent and often inadequate care of patients with cancer pain. The extent of the cancer pain problem and the WHO analgesic-ladder approach to cancer pain relief are reviewed along with recommendations from the American Pain Society. Lack of education of health-care professionals is discussed, focusing on pain assessment, underuse of oral and rectal routes of administration, fears of addiction, and titration of doses of opioid drugs. Simple strategies for beginning to correct these problems are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1380884     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920901)70:3+<1438::aid-cncr2820701536>3.0.co;2-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  7 in total

1.  Morphine: friend or foe?

Authors:  Jane Bates; Liz Gwyther; Natalya Dinat
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 0.875

Review 2.  Pain assessment and management in the long-term care setting.

Authors:  D E Weissman; S Matson
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1999-01

3.  The effectiveness of a self-reporting bedside pain assessment tool for oncology inpatients.

Authors:  Eun Bi Kim; Hye-Suk Han; Jung Hwa Chung; Bo Ram Park; Sung-Nam Lim; Kyoung Hoon Yim; Young Duck Shin; Ki Hyeong Lee; Wun-Jae Kim; Seung Taik Kim
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 4.  Chronic non-malignant musculoskeletal pain in older adults: clinical issues and opioid intervention.

Authors:  V K Podichetty; D J Mazanec; R S Biscup
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Opioid-prescribing Practices in Chronic Cancer Pain in a Tertiary Care Pain Clinic.

Authors:  Raghu S Thota; Pn Jain; Sumitra G Bakshi; Chhaya N Dhanve
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2011-09

6.  Effect of nebulized morphine on dyspnea of mustard gas-exposed patients: a double-blind randomized clinical trial study.

Authors:  Majid Shohrati; Mostafa Ghanei; Asghar Amini Harandi; Soniya Foroghi; Ali Amini Harandi
Journal:  Pulm Med       Date:  2012-03-19

7.  A Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey of Medical Practitioners in India to Assess their Knowledge, Attitude, Prescription Practices, and Barriers toward Opioid Analgesic Prescriptions.

Authors:  Shalini Singh; Shiv Prasad; Sushma Bhatnagar; Rakesh Lal; Nandan Choudhary; Malvinder Singh Sahi
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.