Literature DB >> 1377870

Molecular cytogenetic and clinical studies of 42 patients with marker chromosomes.

D F Callen1, H Eyre, M Y Yip, J Freemantle, E A Haan.   

Abstract

The molecular cytogenetic characterization and clinical details of 20 patients with marker chromosomes are presented. These 20 patients, together with another 22 patients previously published, represent a cohort in which the chromosomal origin of the marker chromosomes was successfully determined in all but one case. Examination of the pooled data suggests that the satellited markers derived from chromosomes 14, 15 (when metacentric or submetacentric), those whose origin is either 13 or 21, and those small ring autosomal markers derived from both alphoid and satellite II or III pericentric heterochromatin of chromosomes 1, 9, 15, and 16 are all associated with a low risk of phenotypic abnormality. The markers identified as i(18p), ring chromosomes derived from various autosomes, and satellited markers derived from chromosome 22 are associated with a high risk of phenotypic abnormality. The phenotype of patients with acrocentric markers derived from chromosome 15 was equivocal, perhaps as a result of imprinting. Additional data are required to confirm these trends. The mild mental retardation and abnormal face of a patient with a small ring chromosome derived from chromosome 4 are described. Identification of patients with small rings originating from particular chromosomes may allow the recognition of new syndromes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1377870     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320430412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  21 in total

1.  Supernumerary marker 15 chromosomes: a clinical, molecular and FISH approach to diagnosis and prognosis.

Authors:  J A Crolla; J F Harvey; F L Sitch; N R Dennis
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Small extra ring chromosome derived from chromosome 10p: clinical report and characterisation by FISH.

Authors:  E Blennow; E Tillberg
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Large inv dup(15) chromosome in two generations.

Authors:  J J Van Der Smagt; J C Giltay; J J De Ne; G H Slabbers
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 4.  Centromere DNA dynamics: latent centromeres and neocentromere formation.

Authors:  K H Choo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Rapid detection of euchromatin by Alu-PRINS: use in clinical cytogenetics.

Authors:  D F Callen; M Y Yip; H J Eyre
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Autism or atypical autism in maternally but not paternally derived proximal 15q duplication.

Authors:  E H Cook; V Lindgren; B L Leventhal; R Courchesne; A Lincoln; C Shulman; C Lord; E Courchesne
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Tetrasomy 15q: two marker chromosomes with no detectable alpha-satellite DNA.

Authors:  E Blennow; H Telenius; D de Vos; C Larsson; P Henriksson; O Johansson; N P Carter; M Nordenskjöld
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 8.  Chromosome abnormalities without phenotypic consequences.

Authors:  Małgorzata Kowalczyk; Małgorzata Srebniak; Agnieszka Tomaszewska
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The origin of cytologically unidentifiable chromosome abnormalities: six cases ascertained by targeted chromosome-band painting.

Authors:  T Ohta; T Tohma; H Soejima; Y Fukushima; T Nagai; K Yoshiura; Y Jinno; N Niikawa
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  An unusual dicentric Y chromosome with a functional centromere with no detectable alpha-satellite.

Authors:  N Bukvic; F Susca; M Gentile; E Tangari; A Ianniruberto; G Guanti
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.