Literature DB >> 1373108

Second generation anti-MUC1 peptide monoclonal antibodies.

P X Xing1, J Prenzoska, K Quelch, I F McKenzie.   

Abstract

Second generation antibodies to mammary mucins were produced by immunizing mice with a peptide with a sequence deduced from that of the MUC1 complementary DNA sequence (PAHGVTSAPDTRPAPGSTAP). Four monoclonal antibodies (BCP7-10) were produced which gave different reactions. BCP8 was similar in tissue reactivity (by immunoperoxidase staining) to anti-breast cancer or anti-human milk fat globule membranes (HMFG) antibodies and reacted strongly with most breast cancers and a proportion of other adenocarcinomas, whether formalin fixed or fresh, and reacted less strongly with some normal tissues. The three other antibodies (BCP7, BCP9, BCP10) reacted only with fresh tissues or a single cell line (LS174T of colon cancer origin) and gave variable weak reactions. Like many anti-mucin antibodies BCP8 reacted with HMFG, but more strongly with deglycosylated HMFG; analysis with peptides by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay indicated reactivity with an epitope contained in the amino acid motif PDTR and using the pepscan method, the minimum epitope was DTR. MAbs BCP7, BCP9, and BCP10 did not react with HMFG; substantial reactions were obtained with deglycosylated HMFG for BCP7 and weaker reactions with BCP9 and BCP10. The finding that BCP7 reacted with breast cancer tissues and deglycosylated HMFG suggested that the epitope recognized by BCP7 was masked in native form and exposed in cancer, indicating that BCP7 could be a useful agent for analyzing differences between normal and cancer mucins. The amino acid epitopes for these antibodies were VTSA (BCP7), GSTAP (BCP9), and RPAP (BCP10). For BCP8, amino acid substitution analysis of SAPDTR indicated that substitutions were poorly tolerated (except Q for T and L/Y for R), contrasting with the substitution analysis of anti-mucin antibody reactions where virtually any amino acid can be substituted for T, indicating that in the native state T (threonine) may be O-glycosylated. The use of synthetic peptides to produce antibodies similar to those produced using crude mucins or tumor extracts represents a major advance in the production of antitumor reagents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1373108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  9 in total

1.  Natural human anti-Gal alpha(1,3)Gal antibodies react with human mucin peptides.

Authors:  M S Sandrin; H A Vaughan; P X Xing; I F McKenzie
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.916

2.  Alterations in the composition of the supramucosal defense barrier in relation to disease severity of ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Rob J Longman; Richard Poulsom; Anthony P Corfield; Bryan F Warren; Nicholas A Wright; Michael G Thomas
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  Mucin gene expression in Barrett's oesophagus: an in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  G S Arul; M Moorghen; N Myerscough; D A Alderson; R D Spicer; A P Corfield
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Oxidative/reductive conjugation of mannan to antigen selects for T1 or T2 immune responses.

Authors:  V Apostolopoulos; G A Pietersz; B E Loveland; M S Sandrin; I F McKenzie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mucin gene expression in the ileoanal reservoir is altered and may be relevant to the risk of inflammation and dysplasia.

Authors:  P A Sylvester; M Walsh; N Myerscough; B F Warren; A P Corfield; M G Thomas; P Durdey
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Structurally defined synthetic cancer vaccines: analysis of structure, glycosylation and recognition of cancer associated mucin, MUC-1 derived peptides.

Authors:  X Liu; J Sejbal; G Kotovych; R R Koganty; M A Reddish; L Jackson; S S Gandhi; A J Mendonca; B M Longenecker
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.916

7.  Complex carbohydrates are not removed during processing of glycoproteins by dendritic cells: processing of tumor antigen MUC1 glycopeptides for presentation to major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted T cells.

Authors:  Anda M Vlad; Stefan Muller; Mare Cudic; Hans Paulsen; Laszlo Otvos; Franz-Georg Hanisch; Olivera J Finn
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 14.307

8.  Production of anti-breast cancer monoclonal antibodies using a glutathione-S-transferase-MUC1 bacterial fusion protein.

Authors:  V Apostolopoulos; P X Xing; J A Trapani; I F McKenzie
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Specificity analysis of sera from breast cancer patients vaccinated with MUC1-KLH plus QS-21.

Authors:  S Adluri; T Gilewski; S Zhang; V Ramnath; G Ragupathi; P Livingston
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.