Literature DB >> 1372569

The role of the basement membrane in differential expression of keratin proteins in epithelial cells.

M A Kurpakus1, E L Stock, J C Jones.   

Abstract

Extracellular matrix is considered to play an important role in determining the phenotype of cells with which it interacts. Here we have investigated the possibility that extracellular matrix is involved in specifying the pattern of keratin expression in epithelial cells. For these studies, we have developed an explant system in which epithelial cells from one type of stratified epithelial tissue, namely conjunctiva, are maintained on an extracellular matrix substrate derived from a different tissue, namely cornea. These ocular tissues are ideal for such analyses since they express distinct sets of keratins. For example, bovine conjunctival epithelium processed for immunofluorescence is not recognized by antibody preparations against keratin K3 or K12. In contrast, K3 and K12 antibodies generate intense staining in bovine corneal epithelium. At the immunochemical level, conjunctival cells in situ appear to possess no K12 and only trace amounts of K3, whereas corneal epithelial cells in situ possess both K3 and K12. When conjunctival cells are maintained on a corneal substrate with an intact basement membrane for 10 days in vitro they begin to express keratin K12 as determined by immunofluorescence. On the other hand, conjunctival cells that are maintained on a corneal substrate lacking a basement membrane fail to show staining with K12 antibodies. Conjunctival cells begin to show intense staining using K3 antibodies within about 10 days of being placed in culture regardless of their substrate. These results indicate that basement membrane can play a positive role in determining cell-specific expression of certain keratins such as K12. However, other keratins such as K3 may be "unmasked" and/or their expression may be upregulated simply by placing conjunctival epithelial cells in culture. We speculate that in conjunctiva K3 expression is influenced by certain negative exogenous factors. We discuss the possible means of regulation of keratin expression in our model system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1372569     DOI: 10.1016/0012-1606(92)90239-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  19 in total

Review 1.  Amniotic membrane transplantation.

Authors:  H S Dua; A Azuara-Blanco
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  In vitro tissue engineering of lamellar cornea using human amniotic epithelial cells and rabbit cornea stroma.

Authors:  Xiao-Yong Liu; Jian Chen; Qing Zhou; Jing Wu; Xiao-Ling Zhang; Li Wang; Xiao-Yan Qin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Cultured corneal epithelia for ocular surface disease.

Authors:  I R Schwab
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

4.  Collagen gel-embedding culture of conjunctival epithelial cells.

Authors:  A Niiya; Y Matsumoto; T Ishibashi; K Matsumoto; S Kinoshita
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Regulation and clinical implications of corneal epithelial stem cells.

Authors:  S C Tseng
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  A useful approach for the screening of active neural-inducing factors.

Authors:  Akio S Suzuki; Toshiaki Tabata; Yoshiyuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Rouxs Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1994-05

Review 7.  Limbal stem cells: Central concepts of corneal epithelial homeostasis.

Authors:  Jinny J Yoon; Salim Ismail; Trevor Sherwin
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 5.326

8.  Mutations in TCF8 cause posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy and ectopic expression of COL4A3 by corneal endothelial cells.

Authors:  Charles M Krafchak; Hemant Pawar; Sayoko E Moroi; Alan Sugar; Paul R Lichter; David A Mackey; Shahzad Mian; Theresa Nairus; Victor Elner; Miriam T Schteingart; Catherine A Downs; Theresa Guckian Kijek; Jenae M Johnson; Edward H Trager; Frank W Rozsa; Md Nawajes Ali Mandal; Michael P Epstein; Douglas Vollrath; Radha Ayyagari; Michael Boehnke; Julia E Richards
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Randomised controlled study of conjunctival autograft versus amniotic membrane graft in pterygium excision.

Authors:  P Luanratanakorn; T Ratanapakorn; O Suwan-Apichon; R S Chuck
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 10.  Human amniotic membrane transplantation: Different modalities of its use in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Chintan Malhotra; Arun K Jain
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.