Literature DB >> 1372412

Survival in 1,431 pacemaker patients: prognostic factors and comparison with the general population.

V Jelić1, K Belkić, M Djordjević, D Kocović.   

Abstract

A total of 1,431 patients (mean age 63.4 +/- 14.1) with pacemakers (96.2% VVI) primoimplanted between 1967 and 1985 were followed for a mean duration of 78.2 +/- 40 pacing months, with 0.6% loss to follow-up. Cumulative survival for 1, 3, and 10 years was 0.9427, 0.9136, and 0.7536, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival between atrioventricular block (AVB) and sick sinus syndrome (SSS) patients. In addition to age and gender, factors existent prior to implantation that independently affected prognosis included manifest coronary heart disease (CHD), congenital/acquired heart lesions, heart failure, noncardiac internal disease, syncope, and generalized fatigue. After implantation, the most important factor was generalized fatigue, then age, stroke, myocardial infarct (MI), gender (male), heart failure, and syncope. Patients with no underlying disease showed an extremely high cumulative survival (0.9173 at 10 years). Compared to the general population of Yugoslavia, the pacemaker patients showed a similar yearly mortality rate until 1981. After that, elderly males (70+) had a significantly lower yearly mortality than the matched population. Thus, in this large series of pacemaker patients followed into the most recent period with an extremely low loss to follow-up, short- and long-term survival was very high. Pacemaker patients of any age who are otherwise in good health have an excellent prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1372412     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb03057.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

Review 1.  Window to the heart: the value of a native and paced QRS duration. Current perspective and review.

Authors:  Himanshu H Shukla; Erskine A James; John A Schutz; Benjamin F Lloyd; Greg C Flaker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Association of selected factors with long-term prognosis and mortality after dual-chamber pacemaker implant.

Authors:  Maciej Dębski; Mateusz Ulman; Andrzej Ząbek; Krzysztof Boczar; Kazimierz Haberka; Marcin Kuniewicz; Jacek Lelakowski; Barbara Małecka
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.737

3.  The prognostic value of pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with permanent pacemakers.

Authors:  André C Lapeyre; Indu G Poornima; Todd D Miller; David O Hodge; Timothy F Christian; Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Optimising pacemaker therapy and medical therapy in pacemaker patients for heart failure: protocol for the OPT-PACE randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Maria F Paton; John Gierula; Haqeel A Jamil; Judith E Lowry; Rowena Byrom; Richard G Gillott; Hemant Chumun; Richard M Cubbon; David A Cairns; Deborah D Stocken; Mark T Kearney; Klaus K Witte
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Sex Differences and Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Pacemakers.

Authors:  Martin Riesenhuber; Andreas Spannbauer; Friedrich Rauscha; Herwig Schmidinger; Adelinde Boszotta; Thomas Pezawas; Christoph Schukro; Marianne Gwechenberger; Günter Stix; Anahit Anvari; Thomas Wrba; Cesar Khazen; Martin Andreas; Günther Laufer; Christian Hengstenberg; Mariann Gyöngyösi
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-09-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.