Literature DB >> 1370828

Base mispair extension kinetics. Binding of avian myeloblastosis reverse transcriptase to matched and mismatched base pair termini.

S Creighton1, M M Huang, H Cai, N Arnheim, M F Goodman.   

Abstract

We investigate the enzymatic basis for the inefficient extension of single base mismatches by DNA polymerase compared with the extension of correct base pairs. Inefficient mismatch extension could result from either a reduced binding of the enzyme to mispaired versus correctly paired DNA template-primer termini, or from a lowered intrinsic rate of extension of mispairs by a bound enzyme, or from a combination of both factors. Avian myeloblastosis reverse transcriptase is used to measure the affinities (equilibrium dissociation constants) for the four matched and twelve mismatched base pair configurations situated at a primer 3'-terminus. The binding affinities are analyzed by two different assays employing polyacrylamide gels. The first assay uses steady-state kinetics to measure the efficiency of elongating correct and incorrect base pairs and to evaluate the enzyme's dissociation constants for matched and mismatched termini. The estimated KD values obtained in the steady-state analysis fall within a range of approximately 0.1-20 nM. The efficiencies of extending two of the mispairs, G.G and C.C, are too low to allow a determination of KD by the kinetics method. The second assay uses equilibrium binding to measure the ratio of polymerase bound to matched compared with mismatched termini, KDright/KDwrong. The affinity ratios, including values for G.G and C.C mispairs, are in the range of about 0.4-4.2. While around 1 order of magnitude difference is observed in the relative binding affinities of the polymerase for matched and mismatched primer termini, the relative extension efficiencies vary over more than 5 orders of magnitude. Therefore, it appears that inefficient mismatch extension is caused primarily by a kinetic block inhibiting elongation from mispaired primer 3'-termini rather than to a difference in binding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1370828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  22 in total

1.  Development of allele-specific PCR and RT-PCR assays for clustered resistance genes using a potato late blight resistance transgene as a model.

Authors:  B P Millett; J M Bradeen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  DNA polymerase activity on synthetic N3'→P5' phosphoramidate DNA templates.

Authors:  Victor S Lelyveld; Derek K O'Flaherty; Lijun Zhou; Enver Cagri Izgu; Jack W Szostak
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  The effect of primer-template mismatches on the detection and quantification of nucleic acids using the 5' nuclease assay.

Authors:  Ralph Stadhouders; Suzan D Pas; Jeer Anber; Jolanda Voermans; Ted H M Mes; Martin Schutten
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  High rate of mismatch extension during reverse transcription in a single round of retrovirus replication.

Authors:  G A Pulsinelli; H M Temin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Multiplex genotype determination at a large number of gene loci.

Authors:  Z Lin; X Cui; H Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Differences in mutagenesis during minus strand, plus strand and strand transfer (recombination) synthesis of the HIV-1 gene in vitro.

Authors:  W Wu; C Palaniappan; R A Bambara; P J Fay
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  Error-prone retrotransposition: rime of the ancient mutators.

Authors:  B D Preston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Strand transfer is enhanced by mismatched nucleotides at the 3' primer terminus: a possible link between HIV reverse transcriptase fidelity and recombination.

Authors:  L Diaz; J J DeStefano
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Unequal fidelity of leading strand and lagging strand DNA replication on the Escherichia coli chromosome.

Authors:  I J Fijalkowska; P Jonczyk; M M Tkaczyk; M Bialoskorska; R M Schaaper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A comparison of the fidelity of copying 5-methylcytosine and cytosine at a defined DNA template site.

Authors:  J C Shen; S Creighton; P A Jones; M F Goodman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.