Literature DB >> 137024

The burst abdominal wound: a mechanical approach.

T P Jenkins.   

Abstract

The burst abdominal wound has a mechanical cause. It is the results of suture breaking, knot slipping, the intact suture cutting out of the tissues or protrusion of gut or omentum between stitches. Measurements of abdominal girth and the xiphoid-pubis distance before and during abdominal distension show that a wound may lengthen by 30 per cent if distension occurs. An adequate reserve of suture length in the wound is necessary to allow this lengthening to occur and to ensure a minimal resulting rise in tension between the sutures and the tissues. Three variables present in every continuous wound closure--the suture length inserted, the wound fasical length and the number of stitches--determine the stitch interval and the size of the tissue bite, which are the two vital factors in wound strength under the surgeon's control. These variables may be expressed by the ratio of the length of suture (SL) inserted to the wound length (WL), the ratio SL:WL. Analytical and clinical evidence is presented to show that: 1. Deep wound disruption (evisceration and ventral hernia) is associated with the use of an SL: WL ratio of 2: 1 or less-the lower the ratio, the greater is the risk of a burst wound. 2. Wound disruption because of cutting out of sutures can be prevented by the use of non-absorbable continuous sutures at 1-cm intervals and an SL:WL ratio of 4:1 or more.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 137024     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800631110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  44 in total

1.  Risk factors for wound complications in midline abdominal incisions related to the size of stitches.

Authors:  D Millbourn; Y Cengiz; L A Israelsson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Wound complications and stitch length.

Authors:  D Millbourn; L A Israelsson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-09-06       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  An unusual complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C McGuiness; A Choy; H Gajraj
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  [Incision and closure of the abdominal wall].

Authors:  M Bolli; M Schilling
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Does mass closure of midline laparotomies stand the test of time?

Authors:  T P Jenkins
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Read this.

Authors:  R M Kirk
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Novafil. A dynamic suture for wound closure.

Authors:  G T Rodeheaver; W S Nesbit; R F Edlich
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Six-fold suture:wound length ratio for abdominal closure.

Authors:  S Varshney; P Manek; C D Johnson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  A prospective study of predictors for post laparotomy abdominal wound dehiscence.

Authors:  Garg Ramneesh; Shah Sheerin; Singh Surinder; Singh Bir
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-01-12

10.  [Fascial healing and wound failure].

Authors:  V Fackeldey; J Höer; U Klinge
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.