Literature DB >> 13680362

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs): genotype-phenotype correlation and classification.

Heike Starke1, Angela Nietzel, Anja Weise, Anita Heller, Kristin Mrasek, Britta Belitz, Christine Kelbova, Marianne Volleth, Beate Albrecht, Beate Mitulla, Ralf Trappe, Iris Bartels, Sabine Adolph, Andreas Dufke, Sylke Singer, Markus Stumm, Rolf-Dieter Wegner, Jörg Seidel, Angela Schmidt, Alma Kuechler, Isolde Schreyer, Uwe Claussen, Ferdinand von Eggeling, Thomas Liehr.   

Abstract

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs) are present in about 0.05% of the human population. In approximately 30% of SMC carriers (excluding the approximately 60% SMC derived from one of the acrocentric chromosomes), an abnormal phenotype is observed. The clinical outcome of an SMC is difficult to predict as they can have different phenotypic consequences because of (1). differences in euchromatic DNA-content, (2). different degrees of mosaicism, and/or (3). uniparental disomy (UPD) of the chromosomes homologous to the SMC. Here, we present 35 SMCs, which are derived from all human chromosomes, apart from chromosome 6, as demonstrated by the appropriate molecular cytogenetic approaches, such as centromere-specific multicolor fluoresence in situ hybridization (cenM-FISH), multicolor banding (MCB), and subcentromere-specific multicolor FISH (subcenM-FISH). In nine cases without an aberrant phenotype, neither partial proximal trisomies nor UPD could be detected. Abnormal clinical findings, such as psychomotoric retardation and/or craniofacial dysmorphisms, were associated with seven of the cases in which subcentromeric single-copy probes were proven to be present in three copies. Conversely, in eight cases with a normal phenotype, proximal euchromatic material was detected as partial trisomy. UPD was studied in 12 cases and subsequently detected in two of the cases with SMC (partial UPD 4p and maternal UPD 22 in a der(22)-syndrome patient), indicating that SMC carriers have an enhanced risk for UPD. At present, small proximal trisomies of 1p, 1q, 2p, 6p, 6q, 7q, 9p, and 12q seem to lead to clinical manifestations, whereas partial proximal trisomies of 2q, 3p, 3q, 5q, 7p, 8p, 17p, and 18p may not be associated with significant clinical symptoms. With respect to clinical outcome, a classification of SMCs is proposed that considers molecular genetic and molecular cytogenetic characteristics as demonstrated by presently available methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13680362     DOI: 10.1007/s00439-003-1016-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  51 in total

Review 1.  Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a prenatally detected supernumerary minute marker chromosome 8.

Authors:  H Starke; I Schreyer; C Kähler; W Fiedler; V Beensen; A Heller; A Nietzel; U Claussen; T Liehr
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  A transmitted deletion of 2q13 to 2q14.1 causes no phenotypic abnormalities.

Authors:  N D Sumption; J C Barber
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Small marker chromosome identification in metaphase and interphase using centromeric multiplex fish (CM-FISH).

Authors:  O Henegariu; P Bray-Ward; S Artan; G H Vance; M Qumsyieh; D C Ward
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.662

4.  A supernumerary marker chromosome originating from two different regions of chromosome 18.

Authors:  B Röthlisberger; K Chrzanowska; D Balmer; M Riegel; A Schinzel
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  AcroM fluorescent in situ hybridization analyses of marker chromosomes.

Authors:  S Langer; C Fauth; M Rocchi; J Murken; M R Speicher
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Pitfalls of rapid prenatal diagnosis using the interphase nucleus.

Authors:  T Liehr; V Beensen; R Hauschild; M Ziegler; I Hartmann; H Starke; A Heller; C Kähler; M Schmidt; W Reiber; M Hesse; U Claussen
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Der(22) syndrome and velo-cardio-facial syndrome/DiGeorge syndrome share a 1.5-Mb region of overlap on chromosome 22q11.

Authors:  B Funke; L Edelmann; N McCain; R K Pandita; J Ferreira; S Merscher; M Zohouri; L Cannizzaro; A Shanske; B E Morrow
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Mosaicism for the Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A duplication suggests somatic reversion.

Authors:  T Liehr; B Rautenstrauss; H Grehl; K D Bathke; A Ekici; A Rauch; H D Rott
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Mechanisms of small ring formation suggested by the molecular characterization of two small accessory ring chromosomes derived from chromosome 4.

Authors:  Y Y Fang; H J Eyre; S K Bohlander; A Estop; E McPherson; T Träger; O Riess; D F Callen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Using a pericentromeric interspersed repeat to recapitulate the phylogeny and expansion of human centromeric segmental duplications.

Authors:  J E Horvath; C L Gulden; J A Bailey; C Yohn; J D McPherson; A Prescott; B A Roe; P J de Jong; M Ventura; D Misceo; N Archidiacono; S Zhao; S Schwartz; M Rocchi; E E Eichler
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  34 in total

1.  Molecular-cytogenetic characterization of the origin and the presence of pericentromeric euchromatin on minute supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs).

Authors:  T Liehr; G Hickmann; P Kozlowski; U Claussen; H Starke
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Three unusual but cytogenetically similar cases with up to five different cell lines involving structural and numerical abnormalities of chromosome 18.

Authors:  Isabel M Carreira; Alexandra Mascarenhas; Eunice Matoso; Ana B Couceiro; Lina Ramos; Andreas Dufke; Marie Mazauric; Rüdiger Stressig; Nadezda Kosyakova; Joana B Melo; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  Mechanisms and consequences of small supernumerary marker chromosomes: from Barbara McClintock to modern genetic-counseling issues.

Authors:  Erin L Baldwin; Lorraine F May; April N Justice; Christa L Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs): a spotlight on some nomenclature problems.

Authors:  Thomas Liehr
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 5.  Chromosome 5 derived small supernumerary marker: towards a genotype/phenotype correlation of proximal chromosome 5 imbalances.

Authors:  Joana Barbosa Melo; Liesbeth Backx; Joris R Vermeesch; Heloisa G Santos; Ana C Sousa; Nadezda Kosyakova; Anja Weise; Ferdinand von Eggeling; Thomas Liehr; Isabel Marques Carreira
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Human ring chromosomes and small supernumerary marker chromosomes-do they have telomeres?

Authors:  Roberta Santos Guilherme; Elisabeth Klein; Claudia Venner; Ahmed B Hamid; Samarth Bhatt; Maria Isabel Melaragno; Marianne Volleth; Anna Polityko; Anna Kulpanovich; Nadezda Kosyakova; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for rapid distinction between unique sequence positive and negative marker chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Diane Van Opstal; Marjan Boter; Petra Noomen; Malgorzata Srebniak; Guus Hamers; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Four small supernumerary marker chromosomes derived from chromosomes 6, 8, 11 and 12 in a patient with minimal clinical abnormalities: a case report.

Authors:  Joaquín Fernández-Toral; Laura Rodríguez; Ana Plasencia; María Luisa Martínez-Frías; Elisabeth Ewers; Ahmed B Hamid; Monika Ziegler; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2010-08-03

9.  Molecular cytogenetic characterization of eight small supernumerary marker chromosomes originating from chromosomes 2, 4, 8, 18, and 21 in three patients.

Authors:  Joanna Pietrzak; Kristin Mrasek; Ewa Obersztyn; Pawel Stankiewicz; Nadezda Kosyakova; Anja Weise; Sau Wai Cheung; Wei Wen Cai; Ferdinand von Eggeling; Tadeusz Mazurczak; Ewa Bocian; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Gain of FAM123B and ARHGEF9 in an Obese Man with Intellectual Disability, Congenital Heart Defects and Multiple Supernumerary Ring Chromosomes.

Authors:  R Hochstenbach; M E van Gijn; P-J Krijtenburg; R Raemakers; R van 't Slot; I Renkens; M J Eleveld; J J van der Smagt; M Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2012-11-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.