Literature DB >> 13679929

Increased incidence of parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis with aminosyn PF compared to trophamine.

Kelly Wright1, Kimberly D Ernst, Mark S Gaylord, Joan P Dawson, Tara M Burnette.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis (PNAC) between two pediatric parenteral amino-acid formulations, Aminosyn PF (APF) and Trophamine (TA).
SETTING: Tertiary newborn intensive-care nursery.
SUBJECTS: A total of 661 neonates who received either TA or APF.
DESIGN: Retrospective. The incidence of PNAC was determined in three groups: Group I (TA, 8/19/97 to 8/19/98, n=335), Group II (APF, 8/20/98 to 1/28/99, n=157), and Group III (TA, 1/29/99 to 8/1/99, n=169).
RESULTS: No PNAC developed in any infant receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) for < 3 weeks. Of 141 patients given PN for > or =21 days, 24 were diagnosed with PNAC: Group I (TA, 10/78, 12.8%), Group II (APF, 9/27, 33.3%), and Group III (TA, 5/36, 13.9%). The incidence of PNAC was significantly higher in infants who received APF (p=0.043). Using logistic regression, only birth weight, duration of PN, and use of APF were significant risk factors for the development of PNAC. Despite an earlier initiation of enteral feedings, APF recipients developed PNAC sooner, had higher peak direct bilirubin levels, and remained jaundiced longer.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of APF was temporally associated with a greater than two-fold increase in the incidence of PNAC compared to periods of exclusive TA use. In the absence of significant differences in parenteral nutrient or energy intake in neonates who developed PNAC, we speculate that possible differences between the amino-acid compositions of TA and APF may be responsible for the observed differences in the incidence of PNAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13679929     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  7 in total

1.  Could lipid infusion be a risk for parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis in low birth weight neonates?

Authors:  Jae Il Shin; Ran Namgung; Min Soo Park; Chul Lee
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Plasma amino Acid concentrations in 108 children receiving a pediatric amino Acid formulation as part of parenteral nutrition.

Authors:  Chasity M Shelton; Amanda J Clark; Michael C Storm; Richard A Helms
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-04

3.  A safe and efficacious preventive strategy in the high-risk surgical neonate: cycled total parenteral nutrition.

Authors:  Joseph A Sujka; Katrina L Weaver; Joel D Lim; Katherine W Gonzalez; Deborah J Biondo; David Juang; Pablo Aguayo; Richard J Hendrickson
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Incidence and Risk Factors of Parenteral Nutrition-Associated Cholestasis in Omani Neonates: Single centre experience.

Authors:  Sharef W Sharef; Siham Al-Sinani; Khalid Al-Naamani; Ibrahim Al-Zakwani; Zenaida S Reyes; Hilal Al-Ryiami; Ashfaq A Khan; Watfa Al-Mamari
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2015-05-28

5.  Risks and benefits of prophylactic cyclic parenteral nutrition in surgical neonates.

Authors:  T Hang Nghiem-Rao; Laura D Cassidy; Elizabeth M Polzin; Casey M Calkins; Marjorie J Arca; Praveen S Goday
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.080

6.  Prevention and treatment of intestinal failure-associated liver disease in children.

Authors:  Bram P Raphael; Christopher Duggan
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 6.115

7.  Parenteral nutrition-induced cholestasis in neonates: where does the problem lie?

Authors:  Kheira Jolin-Dahel; Emanuela Ferretti; Carolina Montiveros; Renee Grenon; Nick Barrowman; Carolina Jimenez-Rivera
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 2.260

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.