Literature DB >> 13679417

Responses of tonically active neurons in the monkey striatum discriminate between motivationally opposing stimuli.

Sabrina Ravel1, Eric Legallet, Paul Apicella.   

Abstract

The striatum is involved in the control of appetitively motivated behavior. We found previously that tonically active neurons (TANs) in the monkey striatum show discriminative responses to different stimuli that are appetitive or aversive. However, these differential responses may reflect the sensory qualities of the stimulus rather than its motivational value. In the present study, we sought to define more precisely the relationship between the particular aspect of the response of TANs and the motivational value of stimuli. For this purpose, three monkeys were presented with two types of aversive stimuli (loud sound and air puff) and one appetitive stimulus (fruit juice). In most instances, the TAN responses to the loud sound and the air puff were similar, in terms of response pattern and duration, whereas responses to the liquid reward showed distinct features. Using classical appetitive conditioning, we reversed the motivational value of a stimulus so that a previously aversive stimulus was now associatively paired with a reward and found that this manipulation selectively modifies the expression of TAN responses to the stimulus. These data indicate that the characteristics of neuronal responses undergo modifications when the valence of the stimulus is changed from aversive to appetitive during associative learning, suggesting that TANs may contribute to a form of stimulus encoding that is dependent on motivational attributes. The adaptation of TAN responses such as observed in the present study likewise reflects a neuronal system that adjusts to the motivational information about environmental events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13679417      PMCID: PMC6740365     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  36 in total

Review 1.  Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive, and alerting.

Authors:  Ethan S Bromberg-Martin; Masayuki Matsumoto; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Separate brain regions code for salience vs. valence during reward prediction in humans.

Authors:  Jimmy Jensen; Andrew J Smith; Matthäus Willeit; Adrian P Crawley; David J Mikulis; Irina Vitcu; Shitij Kapur
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Stable encoding of task structure coexists with flexible coding of task events in sensorimotor striatum.

Authors:  Yasuo Kubota; Jun Liu; Dan Hu; William E DeCoteau; Uri T Eden; Anne C Smith; Ann M Graybiel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  The role of the striatum in aversive learning and aversive prediction errors.

Authors:  Mauricio R Delgado; Jian Li; Daniela Schiller; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  IH current generates the afterhyperpolarisation following activation of subthreshold cortical synaptic inputs to striatal cholinergic interneurons.

Authors:  Manfred J Oswald; Dorothy E Oorschot; Jan M Schulz; Janusz Lipski; John N J Reynolds
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  GABAergic inputs from direct and indirect striatal projection neurons onto cholinergic interneurons in the primate putamen.

Authors:  Kalynda Kari Gonzales; Jean-Francois Pare; Thomas Wichmann; Yoland Smith
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Nucleus Accumbens Acetylcholine Receptors Modulate Dopamine and Motivation.

Authors:  Anne L Collins; Tara J Aitken; Venuz Y Greenfield; Sean B Ostlund; Kate M Wassum
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Multiphasic modulation of cholinergic interneurons by nigrostriatal afferents.

Authors:  Christoph Straub; Nicolas X Tritsch; Nellwyn A Hagan; Chenghua Gu; Bernardo L Sabatini
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Striatal outcome processing in healthy aging.

Authors:  Karin M Cox; Howard J Aizenstein; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Medial temporal lobe functioning and structure in the spontaneously hypertensive rat: comparison with Wistar-Kyoto normotensive and Wistar-Kyoto hypertensive strains.

Authors:  Audrey M Wells; Amy C Janes; Xiaoxu Liu; Christian F Deschepper; Marc J Kaufman; Kathleen M Kantak
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.899

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.