Literature DB >> 13678691

Evaluating health utility in patients with melanoma, breast cancer, colon cancer, and lung cancer: a nationwide, population-based assessment.

Clifford Y Ko1, Melinda Maggard, Edward H Livingston.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the quality of life and health utility for cancer survivors is important; however, little data are available-particularly for long-term (>5 year) survivors. Using "health utility" scores as a proxy for quality of life may be advantageous because it is a single value. Utility scores range from 1.0 (perfect health) to 0 (death), and have been shown to be a good numerical summary of overall quality of life. Using a validated instrument for health utility (HALex), we calculated and report the scores of four different surgical cancers at multiple periods of follow-up, ranging from <1 year to >5 years after diagnosis.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with either breast, colon, melanoma, or lung cancer were studied using the 1998 National Health Information Survey. Responses to several validated questions were collected and health utility scores were calculated. Different time periods were measured; acute (<1 year), short term (1-5 years), and long term (>5 years). Once a single health utility score was calculated, multivariate analyses were performed to identify important predictors of better versus worse health utility scores.
RESULTS: The total sample size was 692 (breast 377, colon 169, melanoma 92, lung 54). Mean ages at diagnosis for the cancer groups were 56, 61, 52, and 60 years, respectively. The mean health utility scores in the acute period after diagnosis were: breast 0.62, colon 0.67, melanoma 0.73, and lung 0.42. In this acute period, the mean utility score for lung cancer survivors was statistically lower versus the others in the acute period (P < 0.001). Although variable trends were noted in the short-term period, all cancers demonstrated an increase in mean scores in the long-term period; the percent increases were: breast 15% (P = 0.01), colon 12%, melanoma 7%, and lung 47%. Multivariate regression analyses identified important associations of health utility scores. Significant predictors of lower health utility included the presence of pain and the presence of co-existent diseases, most commonly joint problems, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS: For four surgical cancers in three time periods after diagnosis, health utility scores were lowest immediately after treatment and improved over time. Long-term (>5 year) survivors had the highest scores. Additionally, our analyses show that a part of health utility in this cohort is determined by the presence of pain and co-existent diseases, which are often items that can be improved by quality clinical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13678691     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4804(03)00167-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  24 in total

1.  Eliciting social preference weights for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung health states.

Authors:  Paul Kind; Susan Macran
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Health behaviors of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer survivors.

Authors:  Paul Krebs; Elliot J Coups; Marc B Feinstein; Jack E Burkhalter; Richard M Steingart; Amy Logue; Bernard J Park; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Utilization of supportive and palliative care services among oncology outpatients at one academic cancer center: determinants of use and barriers to access.

Authors:  Pallavi Kumar; David Casarett; Amy Corcoran; Krupali Desai; Qing Li; Jinbo Chen; Corey Langer; Jun J Mao
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 4.  Riding the crest of the teachable moment: promoting long-term health after the diagnosis of cancer.

Authors:  Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Noreen M Aziz; Julia H Rowland; Bernardine M Pinto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Melanoma survivors: health behaviors, surveillance, psychosocial factors, and family concerns.

Authors:  Susan A Oliveria; Elyse Shuk; Jennifer L Hay; Maureen Heneghan; Jacqueline M Goulart; Katherine Panageas; Alan C Geller; Allan C Halpern
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Capitated Patient Navigation Program for Medicare Beneficiaries with Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Chun-Ru Chien; Rocio Moguel; Mike Hernandez; Richard A Hajek; Lovell A Jones
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship.

Authors:  Julian R Molina; Ping Yang; Stephen D Cassivi; Steven E Schild; Alex A Adjei
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Health utility scores of colorectal cancer based on societal preference in Japan.

Authors:  Takeru Shiroiwa; Takashi Fukuda; Kiichiro Tsutani
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Epidemiology of lung cancer prognosis: quantity and quality of life.

Authors:  Ping Yang
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

Review 10.  A systematic review of health-related quality of life in cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  D Cornish; C Holterhues; L V van de Poll-Franse; J W Coebergh; T Nijsten
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.