Literature DB >> 13677814

Spatial attention: normal processes and their breakdown.

Shaun P Vecera1, Matthew Rizzo.   

Abstract

Although "attention" is a general term in everyday folk and psychologic use, using research from cognitive psychology allows a focus on the processes associated with attention. A process-oriented definition of attention [2] makes "attention" a concept that can be studied rigorously. Attention is necessary for eliminating unwanted sensory inputs or irrelevant behavioral tasks and is useful when some cognitive system or process receives too many inputs. Attention acts to restrict the number of inputs and allow processing to continue in an effective manner. Although there are many forms of attentional selection, spatial attention is the most studied and perhaps the best understood form of selection. Spatial attention is the variety of attention most widely studied in neuropsychologic populations. As was evident from the authors' review, different neuropsychologic syndromes can be characterized as involving different difficulties with the component processes of spatial attention. Different neural structures work in concert to produce normal spatial selection, and damage to any of these neural structures, including the parietal and frontal lobes, pulvinar, and superior colliculus, produce an attentional impairment. Attentional impairments often have been studied in cases of focal brain damage resulting from stroke, traumatic brain injury, tumor, and surgical resection. Focal or multifocal lesions caused by neurodegenerative impairments, such as PSP and AD, however, also have marked effects on neural processes of attention. Patients with AD exhibit a range of impairments in spatial attention, and these impairments have been studied relatively little. Despite the understanding of attention provided by various patient populations, gaps remain in knowledge of the mechanisms involved in attending to space. For example, most studies of neurologic patients have used a simple spatial cuing paradigm with highly predictive cues. Although this task yields robust results and can be adapted for use with many different patient groups, the spatial cuing effects produced by such tasks have multiple interpretations (e.g., allocation of resources versus reduction of decision noise). This review highlights the general point that different neural sites seem to be responsible for different forms of attentional control, such as object-based attention, attentional task switching, and the executive control of attention [8.33]. Understanding the integration of these neural sites and their relationship to cognitive processes and, ultimately, behavior, will increase understanding of normal and disordered attentional selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13677814     DOI: 10.1016/s0733-8619(02)00103-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Clin        ISSN: 0733-8619            Impact factor:   3.806


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of local field potential signals in decoding of visual attention.

Authors:  Zahra Seif; Mohammad Reza Daliri
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Enlargement of thalamic nuclei in Tourette syndrome.

Authors:  Ann M Miller; Ravi Bansal; Xuejun Hao; Juan Pablo Sanchez-Pena; Loren J Sobel; Jun Liu; Dongrong Xu; Hongtu Zhu; M Mallar Chakravarty; Kathleen Durkin; Iliyan Ivanov; Kerstin J Plessen; Christoph B Kellendonk; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-09

3.  Enhancing Spatial Attention and Working Memory in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Camarin E Rolle; Joaquin A Anguera; Sasha N Skinner; Bradley Voytek; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Social and non-social cueing of visuospatial attention in autism and typical development.

Authors:  John R Pruett; Angela LaMacchia; Sarah Hoertel; Emma Squire; Kelly McVey; Richard D Todd; John N Constantino; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2011-06

5.  Sex, drugs, and cognition: effects of marijuana.

Authors:  Beth M Anderson; Matthew Rizzo; Robert I Block; Godfrey D Pearlson; Daniel S O'Leary
Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs       Date:  2010-12

6.  Riemannian Geometry of Functional Connectivity Matrices for Multi-Site Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Data Harmonization.

Authors:  Guillem Simeon; Gemma Piella; Oscar Camara; Deborah Pareto
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 7.  Exploring visual-spatial working memory: a critical review of concepts and models.

Authors:  J McAfoose; B T Baune
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 8.  Unraveling the mystery of white matter in depression: A translational perspective on recent advances.

Authors:  Mate Abraham; Annakarina Mundorf; Katja Brodmann; Nadja Freund
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Performance in a Corsi Block-tapping Task following High-frequency Yoga Breathing or Breath Awareness.

Authors:  Ram Kumar Gupta; Savita Agnihotri; Shirley Telles; Acharya Balkrishna
Journal:  Int J Yoga       Date:  2019 Sep-Dec
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.