Literature DB >> 13677803

Adults and children with headache: evidence-based diagnostic evaluation.

L Santiago Medina1, Belinda D'Souza, Elza Vasconcellos.   

Abstract

Headache represents one of the most common complaints in the outpatient and emergency room setting [1]. Most causes of headache are benign and do not require emergent imaging or intervention. The authors' review of the diagnostic tests does not offer absolute indications for neuroimaging because most of the evidence is based on studies that are not randomized controlled trials. Imaging guidelines for adults and children, however, have emerged based on the available level 2 and 3 literature. CT imaging remains the initial test of choice for new-onset headache in adults and headache suggestive of SAH. Most of the available literature also recommends performing lumbar puncture when CT is equivocal in ruling out SAH [1]. The sensitivity of MR imaging appears to be less than CT for SAH [1]. Newer MR imaging techniques need to be tested and developed to determine if they have higher sensitivity than CT or lumbar puncture in the detection of SAH. In adults with suspected brain metastatic disease, contrast-enhanced MR imaging is the imaging study of choice [38,39]. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging is the examination of choice for brain metastatic lesions less than 2 cm [39]. CT angiography and MR angiography have sensitivities greater than 85% for brain aneurysms larger than 5 mm [43]. If clinically warranted, aneurysms smaller than 5 mm may require digitally subtracted angiography because of the low sensitivity of MR and CT angiography. In children, the choice of diagnostic test strategy depends on the risk group. In high-risk patients, MR imaging is the test of choice whereas in low-risk patients, close clinical observation with periodic reassessment is the best strategy [44]. Clinical diagnosis will always play a key role in the evaluation of headache disorders; however, for the small subset of patients who present with headache secondary to an intracranial space-occupying lesion, bleeding, or SAH, making the diagnosis is crucial to decreasing morbidity and mortality. CT, MR imaging, and lumbar puncture play important roles in the assessment of headache disorders, but their future roles will continue to evolve as the technology becomes more sophisticated and robust, and physicians become more expert with their use [1].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13677803     DOI: 10.1016/s1052-5149(03)00026-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am        ISSN: 1052-5149            Impact factor:   2.264


  6 in total

Review 1.  Secondary headaches.

Authors:  Jack Gladstein
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2006-10

Review 2.  Headache.

Authors:  John E Jordan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Child with Headache.

Authors:  Keshavamurthy Mysore Lakshmikantha; Karthi Nallasamy
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  CT angiography in pediatric extremity trauma: preoperative evaluation prior to reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Charles S Hsu; Jeffrey C Hellinger; Geoffrey D Rubin; James Chang
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2007-11-07

5.  Evaluation of CT and MRI Findings among Patients Presented with Chief Complaint of Headache in Central India.

Authors:  Garjesh Singh Rai; Tina Rai; Leena Jain; Mahendra Mohan Vyas; Rakesh Roshan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-02-01

Review 6.  Advanced Imaging in the Evaluation of Migraine Headaches.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Chelsea Hesterman; Mollie Johnston; Nicholas R Dudeck; Andrew C Charles; Juan Pablo Villablanca
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.264

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.