Literature DB >> 13677493

Patients' rights, quality of life, and health care system performance.

Ivan Barofsky1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to promote the development of a social contract between patient and clinician that permits patients to state how they want to live as they survive rather than what they are willing to lose to extend their survival. To do this, patients must have sufficient leverage to affect the nature of the care they receive. This leverage, it is proposed, can be achieved by first making a 'Declaration of Patients' Rights Relative to Their Quality of Life' and then evaluating the extent to which the patient's providers comply with this rights statement. The paper also reviews The World Health Report 2000 [Health Systems: Improving Performance Geneva: WHO, 2000] as an example of an alternative approach to defining a health care social contract and evaluating a health system's performance. Also discussed, were steps that could be taken to facilitate the integration of the patients' rights statement into medical practice and health care systems performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13677493     DOI: 10.1023/a:1025095311107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  13 in total

1.  Mind matters -- group therapy and survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  D Spiegel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-12-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A gap approach to exploring quality of life in mental health.

Authors:  J Welham; M Haire; D Mercer; T Stedman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Assessing quality of life. Moral implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  R Faden; A Leplège
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  A national bill of patients' rights.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Effect of psychosocial treatment on survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  D Spiegel; J R Bloom; H C Kraemer; E Gottheil
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-10-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Standards for validating health measures: definition and content.

Authors:  J E Ware
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

7.  The QLDS: a scale for the measurement of quality of life in depression.

Authors:  S M Hunt; S P McKenna
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Quality of life in cancer patients--an hypothesis.

Authors:  K C Calman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 9.  Subjective well-being.

Authors:  E Diener
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Implementing national standards for cancer pain management: program model and evaluation.

Authors:  M Bookbinder; N Coyle; M Kiss; M L Goldstein; K Holritz; H Thaler; A Gianella; S Derby; M Brown; A Racolin; M N Ho; R K Portenoy
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.612

View more
  2 in total

1.  Parental reporting of quality of care as a determinant of health related quality of life of ill adolescents at a tertiary care hospital in northern India.

Authors:  Kasturi Agnihotri; Shally Awasthi
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  The problems experienced by patients with cancer and their needs for palliative care.

Authors:  Bart H P Osse; Myrra J F J Vernooij-Dassen; Egbert Schadé; Richard P T M Grol
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 3.603

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.