Literature DB >> 1365678

Drug discrimination studies in rats with caffeine and phenylpropanolamine administered separately and as mixtures.

E A Mariathasan1, I P Stolerman.   

Abstract

The discriminative stimulus effects of mixtures of caffeine and phenylpropanolamine (PPA) have been investigated because these drugs have been abused together. Rats were trained to discriminate caffeine (20 mg/kg), PPA (20 mg/kg), or a mixture of both drugs, from saline in a two-bar operant conditioning procedure with food reinforcers presented on a tandem VI-FR schedule. Discriminations of mixture, caffeine alone and PPA alone were 90% accurate after 40 sessions. Generalisation to both PPA and caffeine was weak (25-47%) at the doses used in the training mixture, although there was almost complete generalisation to larger doses of PPA. Under these conditions, there was a possible synergistic interaction between caffeine and PPA because the discriminative effect of the mixture could not be fully explained by the combined effects of its component drugs. However, in rats trained on caffeine, PPA had no effect on the dose-response relationship for caffeine; similarly, in rats trained on PPA, caffeine had no effect on the dose-response relationship for PPA (no synergism or antagonism). Generalisation to (+)-amphetamine and cocaine was weakest in rats trained on caffeine, was partial in rats trained on the mixture, and was complete in rats trained on PPA; thus, the mixture of caffeine and PPA was not more like cocaine or amphetamine than PPA alone. The results are in agreement with reports that caffeine and PPA may interact in a complex manner, but do not support the view that the interaction enhances their resemblance to highly abused stimulants such as amphetamine and cocaine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1365678     DOI: 10.1007/bf02245486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  14 in total

1.  Caffeine-phenylethylamine combinations mimic the cocaine discriminative cue.

Authors:  D V Gauvin; R D Harland; R C Michaelis; F A Holloway
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.037

2.  Low-dose caffeine discrimination in humans.

Authors:  R R Griffiths; S M Evans; S J Heishman; K L Preston; C A Sannerud; B Wolf; P P Woodson
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Drug discrimination and cross generalization between two methylxanthines.

Authors:  H E Modrow; F A Holloway
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine and pentobarbitone separately and as mixtures in rats.

Authors:  E.A. Mariathasan; H.S. Garcha; I.P. Stolerman
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.293

5.  Discrimination of a drug mixture in rats: role of training dose, and specificity.

Authors:  H.S. Garcha; I.P. Stolerman
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.293

6.  Discriminative stimulus properties of methylxanthines and their metabolites in rats.

Authors:  J M Carney; F A Holloway; H E Modrow
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1985-03-11       Impact factor: 5.037

7.  The discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of phenylpropanolamine, mazindol and d-amphetamine in humans.

Authors:  L D Chait; E H Uhlenhuth; C E Johanson
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Prazosin: effect on psychomotor-stimulant cues and locomotor activity in mice.

Authors:  A M Snoddy; R E Tessel
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1985-10-22       Impact factor: 4.432

9.  Phenylpropanolamine: reinforcing and subjective effects in normal human volunteers.

Authors:  L D Chait; E H Uhlenhuth; C E Johanson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Behavioral and neurochemical evaluation of phenylpropanolamine.

Authors:  W L Woolverton; C E Johanson; R de la Garza; S Ellis; L S Seiden; C R Schuster
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of amphetamine-CNS depressant combinations and of other CNS stimulants in four-choice drug discriminations.

Authors:  Mi Li; William D Wessinger; D E McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Ethanol→Nicotine & Nicotine→Ethanol drug-sequence discriminations: Conditional stimulus control with two interoceptive drug elements in rats.

Authors:  Joseph R Troisi
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.405

3.  The interoceptive Pavlovian stimulus effects of caffeine.

Authors:  Jennifer E Murray; Chia Li; Matthew I Palmatier; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 4.  The scientific case that nicotine is addictive.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; M J Jarvis
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.530

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.