Literature DB >> 1365660

Context-drug pairings enhance tolerance to ethanol-induced disruption of operant responding.

C L Cunningham1, S M Losli, F O Risinger.   

Abstract

Much of the research implicating learning in the development of tolerance to ethanol-induced impairment has used an experimental design in which different groups receive drug either before or after an opportunity to perform an instrumental or operant task. The stronger tolerance observed in subjects who perform while intoxicated is most often attributed to the reinforced practice of a learned compensatory response. Using an experimental procedure modeled after Chen (1979), the present study examined an alternative theoretical basis for tolerance in the before-versus-after design. Specifically, the effects of Pavlovian context-drug pairings were assessed under circumstances that precluded reinforced practice of the operant response. Three groups of food-deprived rats were initially trained to barpress for sucrose on an FR15 schedule. After 30 sessions, the bar was retracted and the dipper was covered for a 3-day tolerance acquisition phase. During this phase, each group received an IP injection 15 min before and 45 min after each session. The Paired group received ethanol (1.2 g/kg) before and saline after the session, thus pairing ethanol with cues of the test chamber. The Unpaired group received saline before and ethanol after the session, while the No-Drug group always received saline. During a final test phase, all groups received ethanol (1.5 g/kg) before access to sucrose on the FR schedule. The Paired group completed the first FR15 sequence more rapidly than either control group, indicating that context-ethanol pairings enhanced tolerance to the drug's disruptive effect on the initiation of operant responding.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1365660     DOI: 10.1007/bf02245503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  10 in total

1.  Acquisition of behavioral tolerance to ethanol as a function of reinforced practice in rats.

Authors:  C S Chen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-06-21       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Learning alcohol tolerance: the contribution of response expectancies.

Authors:  M Vogel-Sprott; K Sdao-Jarvie
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Latent inhibition.

Authors:  R E Lubow
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  A study of the alcohol-tolerance effect and an indtroduction of a new behavioural technique.

Authors:  C S Chen
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1968

5.  Mental rehearsal and classical conditioning contribute to ethanol tolerance in humans.

Authors:  W C Annear; M Vogel-Sprott
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Morphine tolerance as habituation.

Authors:  T B Baker; S T Tiffany
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Mental rehearsal of a task under ethanol facilitates tolerance.

Authors:  M Vogel-Sprott; E Rawana; R Webster
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Conditioning and extinction of tolerance to the hypothermic effect of ethanol in rats.

Authors:  J G Mansfield; C L Cunningham
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1980-10

9.  Conditioned tolerance to the hypothermic effect of ethyl alcohol.

Authors:  A D Lê; C X Poulos; H Cappell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Behavioral variables affecting the development of amphetamine tolerance.

Authors:  C R Schuster; W S Dockens; J H Woods
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1966
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.