Literature DB >> 1363544

Ectopic expression of UBX and ABD-B proteins during Drosophila embryogenesis: competition, not a functional hierarchy, explains phenotypic suppression.

M L Lamka1, A M Boulet, S Sakonju.   

Abstract

The Abdominal-B (Abd-B) gene, a member of the bithorax complex (BX-C), specifies the identities of parasegments (PS) 10-14 in Drosophila. Abd-B codes for two structurally related homeodomain proteins, ABD-B m and ABD-B r, that are expressed in PS10-13 and PS14-15, respectively. Although ABD-B m and r proteins have distinct developmental functions, ectopic expression of either protein during embryogenesis induces the development of filzkörper and associated spiracular hairs, structures normally located in PS13, at ectopic sites in the larval thorax and abdomen. These results suggest that other parasegmental differences contribute to the phenotype specified by ABD-B r activity in PS14. Both ABD-B m and r repress the expression of other homeotic genes, such as Ubx and abd-A, in PS10-14. However, the importance of these and other cross-regulatory interactions among homeotic genes has been questioned. Since ectopic UBX protein apparently failed to transform abdominal segments, González-Reyes et al. (González-Reyes, A., Urquía, N., Gehring, W.J., Struhl, G. and Morata, G. (1990). Nature 344, 78-80) proposed a functional hierarchy in which ABD-A and ABD-B activities override UBX activity. We tested this model by expressing UBX and ABD-B m proteins ectopically in wild-type and BX-C-deficient embryos. Ectopic ABD-B m does not prevent transformations induced by ectopic UBX. Instead, ectopic UBX and ABD-B m proteins compete for the specification of segmental identities in a dose-dependent fashion. Our results support a quantitative competition among the homeotic proteins rather than the existence of a strict functional hierarchy. Therefore, we suggest that cross-regulatory interactions are not irrelevant but are important for repressing the expression of competing homeotic proteins. To explain the apparent failure of ectopic UBX to transform the abdominal segments, we expressed UBX at different times during embryonic development. Our results show that ectopic UBX affects abdominal cuticular identities if expressed during early stages of embryogenesis. In later embryonic stages, abdominal segments become resistant to transformation by ectopic UBX while thoracic segments remain susceptible. Head segments also show a similar stage-dependent susceptibility to transformation by ectopic UBX in early embryogenesis but become resistant in later stages. These results suggest that abdominal and head identities are determined earlier than are thoracic identities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1363544     DOI: 10.1242/dev.116.4.841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  27 in total

1.  Structure of HoxA9 and Pbx1 bound to DNA: Hox hexapeptide and DNA recognition anterior to posterior.

Authors:  Nicole A LaRonde-LeBlanc; Cynthia Wolberger
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Functional similarity in appendage specification by the Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A Drosophila HOX genes.

Authors:  F Casares; M Calleja; E Sánchez-Herrero
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Point mutations within and outside the homeodomain identify sequences required for proboscipedia homeotic function in Drosophila.

Authors:  C Benassayag; M Boube; L Seroude; D L Cribbs
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Structure and function analysis of LIN-14, a temporal regulator of postembryonic developmental events in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Y Hong; R C Lee; V Ambros
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Homeotic function of Drosophila Bithorax-complex miRNAs mediates fertility by restricting multiple Hox genes and TALE cofactors in the CNS.

Authors:  Daniel L Garaulet; Monica C Castellanos; Fernando Bejarano; Piero Sanfilippo; David M Tyler; Douglas W Allan; Ernesto Sánchez-Herrero; Eric C Lai
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 12.270

6.  DmOAZ, the unique Drosophila melanogaster OAZ homologue is involved in posterior spiracle development.

Authors:  Anne Krattinger; Nanaë Gendre; Ariane Ramaekers; Nicola Grillenzoni; Reinhard F Stocker
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 0.900

7.  Mobile element 297 in the Abd-B gene of Drosophila melanogaster, not Delta 88, is responsible for the tuh-3 mutation.

Authors:  J A Mack; R D Smith; D T Kuhn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Cis and trans interactions between the iab regulatory regions and abdominal-A and abdominal-B in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J E Hendrickson; S Sakonju
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A combinatorial enhancer recognized by Mad, TCF and Brinker first activates then represses dpp expression in the posterior spiracles of Drosophila.

Authors:  Norma T Takaesu; Denis S Bulanin; Aaron N Johnson; Teresa V Orenic; Stuart J Newfeld
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.582

10.  Functional differences between Ultrabithorax protein isoforms in Drosophila melanogaster: evidence from elimination, substitution and ectopic expression of specific isoforms.

Authors:  V Subramaniam; H M Bomze; A J López
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.