Literature DB >> 1362817

To breed or not to breed: an analysis of the social and density-dependent constraints on the fecundity of female badgers (Meles meles).

W J Cresswell1, S Harris, C L Cheeseman, P J Mallinson.   

Abstract

Data from post-mortem examinations, population density estimates and long term capture-mark-recapture studies have been combined to look at the pattern of reproductive behaviour and the social factors leading to reproductive failure in badgers in Britain. The results are used to evaluate whether the hypothesis that the defence of oestrous females (as opposed to defence of food resources) best explains territorial behaviour and the social organization of badgers. Badgers in Britain have two peaks of reproductive activity, one immediately post partum and one in the summer/autumn. These coincide with two peaks of ovulation, and in the late winter/spring there is a steep rise in the number of sows carrying blastocysts, to reach an asymptote in June for yearling sows and April in older sows. Measured by their contribution to overall productivity, winter/spring matings were much more important than summer/autumn matings, contributing 65% of total autumn blastocysts in yearling sows and 71% of autumn blastocysts in older sows. The relative importance of the two mating periods is reflected in the seasonal pattern of bite wounding in adult male badgers; minor bite wounding in January-March was 2.3 times as frequent as in August-October, and moderate-extensive bite wounding was 3.1 times more frequent. In the populations studied, pre- and post-natal losses were high, with reproductive failure occurring at all stages of the breeding cycle, so that less than 30% of potential productivity was achieved. Indeed 22% of sows failed to develop blastocysts; these had a lower body mass, less body fat, larger adrenal glands, poorer health and higher bite wound scores than sows with blastocysts. Only 44% of adult sows implanted their blastocysts and proceeded to the end of pregnancy. However, it was less easy to identify features characteristic of sows that did or did not go on to implant their blastocysts. Finally, 35% of sows that produced cubs ceased lactation early, and this loss of entire litters was thought to be due to infanticide by dominant sows. The presence of annexe setts correlates with increased productivity in younger sows, and this is thought to be because annexe setts enable younger sows and their cubs to avoid the aggression of older, more dominant sows. Living in large social groups has no net reproductive gain for adult males or females, and there was a decline in productivity (per adult) with increasing group size.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1362817     DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  10 in total

1.  Fertility control as a means of controlling bovine tuberculosis in badger (Meles meles) populations in south-west England: predictions from a spatial stochastic simulation model.

Authors:  P C White; A J Lewis; S Harris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Body condition threshold for breeding in a viviparous snake.

Authors:  Guy Naulleau; Xavier Bonnet
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Mycobacterium bovis in the European badger (Meles meles): epidemiological findings in tuberculous badgers from a naturally infected population.

Authors:  R S Clifton-Hadley; J W Wilesmith; F A Stuart
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.451

4.  Impact of external sources of infection on the dynamics of bovine tuberculosis in modelled badger populations.

Authors:  Joanne L Hardstaff; Mark T Bulling; Glenn Marion; Michael R Hutchings; Piran C L White
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Culling-induced changes in badger (Meles meles) behaviour, social organisation and the epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis.

Authors:  Philip Riordan; Richard John Delahay; Chris Cheeseman; Paul James Johnson; David Whyte Macdonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Neighbouring-group composition and within-group relatedness drive extra-group paternity rate in the European badger (Meles meles).

Authors:  G Annavi; C Newman; H L Dugdale; C D Buesching; Y W Sin; T Burke; D W Macdonald
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Demographic buffering and compensatory recruitment promotes the persistence of disease in a wildlife population.

Authors:  Jenni L McDonald; Trevor Bailey; Richard J Delahay; Robbie A McDonald; Graham C Smith; Dave J Hodgson
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Reproductive Biology Including Evidence for Superfetation in the European Badger Meles meles (Carnivora: Mustelidae).

Authors:  Leigh A L Corner; Lynsey J Stuart; David J Kelly; Nicola M Marples
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Super-ranging. A new ranging strategy in European badgers.

Authors:  Aoibheann Gaughran; David J Kelly; Teresa MacWhite; Enda Mullen; Peter Maher; Margaret Good; Nicola M Marples
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Does litter size variation affect models of terrestrial carnivore extinction risk and management?

Authors:  Eleanor S Devenish-Nelson; Philip A Stephens; Stephen Harris; Carl Soulsbury; Shane A Richards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.