Literature DB >> 1361175

Differentiation of beta-blocker effects on serum lipids and apolipoproteins in hypertensive patients with normolipidaemic or dyslipidaemic profiles.

G P Vyssoulis1, E A Karpanou, C E Pitsavos, J N Skoumas, A A Paleologos, P K Toutouzas.   

Abstract

To evaluate the differential effects of beta-blockers on serum lipids and apolipoproteins in normolipidaemic and dyslipidaemic hypertensives, 330 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were studied 1 month after placebo therapy and 6 months after monotherapy with propranolol (n = 53), atenolol (n = 66), metoprolol (n = 58), pindolol (n = 53), or celiprolol (n = 100). Serum total cholesterol, triglycerides, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), and apolipoproteins (Apo) A1 and B were measured at baseline and study end. A total of 136 (41.2%) patients were considered normolipidaemic (pretreatment LDL-C < 160 mg.dl-1) and 194 (58.8%) were considered dyslipidaemic (LDL-C > 160 mg.dl-1). Changes in total cholesterol differed between normolipidaemics and dyslipidaemics with propranolol (+13% in normolipidaemics vs -0.5% in dyslipidaemics, P < 0.001), atenolol (+7% vs -2%, P = 0.01), metoprolol (+9% vs -4%, P0.0006), pindolol (+8% vs -9%, P < 0.001), and celiprolol (-1% vs -13%, P = 0.002). HDL-C differed less, with propranolol (-18% vs -13%), atenolol (-6% vs -2%), metoprolol (-2% vs -6%), pindolol (+4% vs +1%), and celiprolol (+9% vs +4%); none of these changes between normolipidaemic and dyslipidaemic patients were statistically significant. LDL-C changes differed the most, with propranolol (+35% vs -1%, P < 0.0001), atenolol (+15% vs -4%, P = 0.001), metoprolol (+12% vs -6%, P = 0.004), pindolol (+12% vs -13%, P < 0.0001), and celiprolol (+3% vs -16%, P = 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1361175     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  7 in total

Review 1.  Do partial agonist beta-blockers have improved clinical utility?

Authors:  J D Fitzgerald
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.727

2.  A predictive model of the health benefits and cost effectiveness of celiprolol and atenolol in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  R J Milne; S Vander Hoorn; R T Jackson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Increased postprandial triglyceride-rich lipoprotein levels in elderly survivors of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Samira Lekhal; Trond Børvik; Arne Nordøy; John-Bjarne Hansen
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 1.880

Review 4.  Celiprolol. An evaluation of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of hypertension and angina pectoris.

Authors:  C J Dunn; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  A risk-benefit assessment of celiprolol in the treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  M J Kendall; I Rajman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Association between serum lipids, glucose tolerance, and insulin sensitivity during 12 months of celiprolol treatment.

Authors:  K Malminiemi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.727

7.  Celiprolol: A Unique Selective Adrenoceptor Modulator.

Authors:  James J Nawarskas; Angela Cheng-Lai; William H Frishman
Journal:  Cardiol Rev       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.644

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.