Literature DB >> 1360673

Variation across species in the size of the nuclear genome supports the junk-DNA explanation for the C-value paradox.

M Pagel1, R A Johnstone.   

Abstract

The amount of DNA in the nuclear genome (the DNA C-value) of eukaryotes varies at least 80,000-fold across species, and yet bears little or no relation to organismic complexity or to the number of protein-coding genes. This phenomenon is known as the C-value paradox. One explanation for the C-value paradox attributes the size of the nuclear genome to 'junk' (typically non-coding) genetic elements that accumulate until the costs to the organism of replicating excess DNA select against it. Across species, organisms that develop at a slower rate should tolerate more junk DNA. Alternatively, junk DNA may function as a nucleo-skeleton to maintain the volume of the nucleus at a size proportional to the volume of the cytoplasm in the cell. Across species, the DNA C-value is predicted to vary with the nuclear and cytoplasmic volumes of cells. Previous studies have not been able to distinguish between the skeletal-DNA and junk-DNA explanations for the C-value paradox. We report a study of DNA content in 24 salamander species which does. The size of the nuclear genome is correlated with developmental rate even after the effects of nuclear and cytoplasmic volume have been removed. However, genome size is not correlated with cytoplasmic volume after controlling for developmental rate. These results support the view that junk DNA accumulates in the nuclear genome until the costs of replicating it become too great, rather than that it functions as a nucleo-skeleton.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1360673     DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  24 in total

1.  Distribution of retroelements in centromeres and neocentromeres of maize.

Authors:  Rebecca J Mroczek; R Kelly Dawe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Cell size as a link between noncoding DNA and metabolic rate scaling.

Authors:  J Kozłowski; M Konarzewski; A T Gawelczyk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Economy, speed and size matter: evolutionary forces driving nuclear genome miniaturization and expansion.

Authors:  Thomas Cavalier-Smith
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Stabilizing selection, purifying selection, and mutational bias in finite populations.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Co-evolution between transposable elements and their hosts: a major factor in genome size evolution?

Authors:  J Arvid Ågren; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Sizing up Arabidopsis genome evolution.

Authors:  S I Wright; J A Agren
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Mechanisms of Evolutionary Innovation Point to Genetic Control Logic as the Key Difference Between Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.

Authors:  William Bains; Dirk Schulze-Makuch
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Ecological constraints associated with genome size across salamander lineages.

Authors:  Gavia Lertzman-Lepofsky; Arne Ø Mooers; Dan A Greenberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Cell size predicts morphological complexity in the brains of frogs and salamanders.

Authors:  G Roth; J Blanke; D B Wake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The random nature of genome architecture: predicting open reading frame distributions.

Authors:  Michael W McCoy; Andrew P Allen; James F Gillooly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.