Literature DB >> 1358966

Analysis of CD4+ T cells that provide contact-dependent bystander help to B cells.

M Croft1, S L Swain.   

Abstract

Although cognate, MHC-restricted interaction of Th cells with Ag-presenting B cells provides effective help to a resting B cell, substantial B cell responses have also been seen with preactivated T cell clones that cannot recognize Ag on the B cell but apparently interact in a noncognate fashion (the bystander response). Here, we have investigated the ability of distinct Th cell subsets and T cells activated by different stimuli to support such bystander B cell responses. We have also determined which cytokines are involved. We generated distinct CD4+ T cell subsets specific for both alloantigen (using normal mice) and cytochrome c (using TCR transgenic mice). To compare cognate and bystander help, we analyzed the response of allogeneic (cognate) vs syngeneic (bystander) resting B cells in the former case, and the response of syngeneic B cells in the presence vs absence of Ag, in the latter case. Both approaches gave similar results. T cells stimulated with Ag for 24 h (naive and memory cells) or generated from naive cells over 4 days in the presence of exogenous IL-2 ("Th1-like" effectors) induced B cells to secrete minimal amounts of bystander Ig (20 to 700 ng/ml), less than 6% of the Ig induced under cognate conditions. In contrast, effectors generated in IL-4 or IL-6 ("Th2-like" and "Th0-like") induced significantly more bystander Ig (4 to 9 micrograms/ml), which was 18 to 30% of the amount produced during a cognate response. Restimulation of Th cell populations with anti-CD3, instead of Ag/APC, enhanced their ability to induce bystander Ig to levels 40 to 100% of those produced through cognate interaction. The addition of anti-cytokine Ab to bystander responses indicated that the cytokines utilized were similar to those mediating response after cognate interaction. Addition of exogenous cytokines did not specifically enhance the extent of the bystander response as a function of the cognate response. These results suggest that most Th cells can efficiently activate only those B cells that present relevant Ag on class II MHC, but that highly activated/differentiated Th effectors also have the ability to induce significant bystander B cell responses through noncognate interactions. We also conclude that the mode of Th cell activation and the cytokines encountered during Th differentiation play a major role in the capacity of helper cells to initiate a bystander response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1358966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  7 in total

1.  NK T cells provide lipid antigen-specific cognate help for B cells.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Leadbetter; Manfred Brigl; Petr Illarionov; Nadia Cohen; Megan C Luteran; Shiv Pillai; Gurdyal S Besra; Michael B Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Vaccine-induced, pseudorabies virus-specific, extrathymic CD4+CD8+ memory T-helper cells in swine.

Authors:  B T Ober; A Summerfield; C Mattlinger; K H Wiesmüller; G Jung; E Pfaff; A Saalmüller; H J Rziha
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 3.  Bridging innate and adaptive antitumor immunity targeting glycans.

Authors:  Anastas Pashov; Bejatolah Monzavi-Karbassi; Gajendra P S Raghava; Thomas Kieber-Emmons
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-15

4.  Outer periarteriolar lymphoid sheath arrest and subsequent differentiation of both naive and tolerant immunoglobulin transgenic B cells is determined by B cell receptor occupancy.

Authors:  M C Cook; A Basten; B Fazekas de St Groth
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1997-08-29       Impact factor: 14.307

5.  Shaping T cell - B cell collaboration in the response to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein gp120 by peptide priming.

Authors:  N Kalaya Steede; Blake J Rust; Mohammad M Hossain; Lucy C Freytag; James E Robinson; Samuel J Landry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Control of CD4 effector fate: transforming growth factor beta 1 and interleukin 2 synergize to prevent apoptosis and promote effector expansion.

Authors:  X Zhang; L Giangreco; H E Broome; C M Dargan; S L Swain
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 14.307

7.  Generation of polarized antigen-specific CD8 effector populations: reciprocal action of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-12 in promoting type 2 versus type 1 cytokine profiles.

Authors:  M Croft; L Carter; S L Swain; R W Dutton
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1994-11-01       Impact factor: 14.307

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.