Literature DB >> 135885

Dynamics of the chest wall during speech production: function of the thorax, rib cage, diaphragm, and abdomen.

T J Hixon, J Mead, M D Goldman.   

Abstract

Anteroposterior diameters of the rib cage and abdomen and esophageal and gastric pressures were measured in normal subjects in upright and supine body positions during respiratory maneuvers and utterance tasks. Data were charted in relative motion diagrams and various motion-pressure diagrams which enabled graphic solution for muscular pressures exerted by the chest wall and individually by the thorax, rib cage, diaphragm, and abdomen during utterances. Behaviors of the chest wall and its parts were found to depend upon lung volume, utterance loudness, body position, and utterance task. For utterances encompassing most of the vital capacity, chest wall effort was at first net inspiratory and later net expiratory. The former was governed predominately by the rib cage and the abdomen in the upright body position and by the diaphragm in the supine position. For conversational speech, chest wall effort was continuously expiratory, control being vested in the rib cage and the abdomen in the upright body position and typically in the rib cage alone in the supine position. Mechanisms operating during the utterances are discussed, particularly those involved with conversational speech production. We conclude that the abdomen occupies an especially important role in running conversational speech in that it mechanically tunes the diaphragm to increase the latter's inspiratory efficiency and thus enables man to minimally interrupt his ongoing speech for needed inspiratory pauses. We also discuss the relevance of our findings to clinical endeavors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 135885     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.1902.297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  10 in total

1.  Breath group analysis for reading and spontaneous speech in healthy adults.

Authors:  Yu-Tsai Wang; Jordan R Green; Ignatius S B Nip; Ray D Kent; Jane Finley Kent
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 0.849

2.  Phonation Demonstrates Goal Dependence Under Unique Vocal Intensity and Aerobic Workload Conditions.

Authors:  Aaron Ziegler; Jessie VanSwearingen; John M Jakicic; Katherine Verdolini Abbott
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Accuracy of perceptual and acoustic methods for the detection of inspiratory loci in spontaneous speech.

Authors:  Yu-Tsai Wang; Ignatius S B Nip; Jordan R Green; Ray D Kent; Jane Finley Kent; Cara Ullman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-12

4.  [Diagnosis of dysfunction of the voice (author's transl)].

Authors:  H J Schultz-Coulon
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1980

5.  The Impact of Glottal Configuration on Speech Breathing.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Carolyn M Michener; Laura Enflo; Gabriel J Cler; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Accuracy of perceptually based and acoustically based inspiratory loci in reading.

Authors:  Yu-Tsai Wang; Jordan R Green; Ignatius S B Nip; Ray D Kent; Jane Finley Kent; Cara Ullman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-08

7.  Relative contributions of the ribcage and abdomen to lung volume displacement during speech production.

Authors:  Charalampos Mandros; Christos Kampolis; Georgia Kalliakosta; George E Tzelepis
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-11-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 8.  Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance.

Authors:  Martine Van Puyvelde; Xavier Neyt; Francis McGlone; Nathalie Pattyn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-20

9.  The influence of gravity on respiratory kinematics during phonation measured by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Louisa Traser; Carmen Schwab; Fabian Burk; Ali Caglar Özen; Michael Burdumy; Michael Bock; Bernhard Richter; Matthias Echternach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Respiratory kinematic and airflow differences between reflex and voluntary cough in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Alexandra E Brandimore; Michelle S Troche; Jessica E Huber; Karen W Hegland
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.566

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.