Literature DB >> 1358426

Different sensitivities of human esophageal cancer cells to multiple anti-cancer agents and related mechanisms.

T Saito1, M Hikita, K Kohno, S Sato, H Takano, M Kobayashi.   

Abstract

Mechanisms responsible for drug resistance in human esophageal cancer cell lines were investigated. Three cell lines established from human esophageal carcinoma (TE-1, SH-1, and TH) showed different sensitivities to vindesine, vincristine, cisplatin (CDDP), etoposide (VP-16), and pepleomycin. Both SH-1 and TH cell lines were twofold to sevenfold more resistant to pepleomycin, vindesine, and vincristine than TE-1 was. SH-1 showed twofold more resistance to CDDP than either TE-1 or TH did, and TH and TE-1 showed a 3-fold or 1.5-fold more resistance, respectively, to VP-16 than SH-1 did. The accumulation of tritiated vincristine in SH-1 and TH was approximately 50% that in TE-1. Two multidrug resistance reversal agents, cepharanthine and a synthetic dihydropyridine analogue (NK-252; Nikken Chemicals, Saitama, Japan), potentiated the cytocidal actions of vindesine against SH-1, TH, and TE-1 cells, with no apparent expression of P-glycoprotein in the three cell lines. The glutathione S-transferase pi gene was expressed in all three cell lines. DNA topoisomerase II levels were lowest in TE-1, followed by SH-1 and TH, although the accumulation of tritiated VP-16 was less in both TH and SH-1 than in TE-1. Differential sensitivities to anti-cancer drugs appear to be mediated through pleiotropic mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1358426     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19921115)70:10<2402::aid-cncr2820701005>3.0.co;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  4 in total

1.  Cytochrome P450 expression in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  G I Murray; D Shaw; R J Weaver; J A McKay; S W Ewen; W T Melvin; M D Burke
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Lack of correlation of P-glycoprotein expression with response to MIC chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  S J Darnton; K Jenner; R S Steyn; D R Ferry; H R Matthews
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Assessment of Early Growth Response 1 in Tumor Suppression of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yen-Chiang Tseng; Chih-Wen Shu; Hui-Min Chang; Yi-Hsuan Lin; Yen-Han Tseng; Han-Shui Hsu; Yih-Gang Goan; Ching-Jiunn Tseng
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 4.  ABC Transporters and Their Role in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  David Vrana; Viktor Hlavac; Veronika Brynychova; Radka Vaclavikova; Cestmir Neoral; Jiri Vrba; Rene Aujesky; Marcel Matzenauer; Bohuslav Melichar; Pavel Soucek
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.