Literature DB >> 1358054

Neurotransmitter receptors involved in post-training memory processing by the amygdala, medial septum, and hippocampus of the rat.

I Izquierdo1, C da Cunha, R Rosat, D Jerusalinsky, M B Ferreira, J H Medina.   

Abstract

Rats were trained and tested in habituation to a novel environment and step-down inhibitory avoidance. Immediately after training in each task the animals received intra-amygdala, intraseptal, or intrahippocampal micro-injections of agonists and antagonists of various neurotransmitter receptors. In the habitation task, intrahippocampal, but not intra-amygdala or intraseptal administration of the NMDA receptor antagonist aminophosphornopentanoic acid (AP5, 5.0 micrograms) or of the muscarinic receptor antagonist, scopolamine (2.0 micrograms) caused amnesia and the indirect antagonist of GABA-A receptors, picrotoxin (0.08 microgram), caused retrograde facilitation. Intrahippocampal administration of the respective agonists, glutamate, oxotremorine, and muscimol, had effects of their own opposite to those of the blockers, and norepinephrine (0.3 microgram) caused memory facilitation. In the avoidance task, results obtained with drug infusions given into the three structures were very similar: in all cases, AP5, scopolamine, and muscimol were amnestic, and glutamate, oxotremorine, norepinephrine, and picrotoxin caused memory facilitation. In addition, also in the three structures, picrotoxin counteracted the amnestic effect of AP5 and/or scopolamine and the beta-adrenoceptor blocker, timolol (0.3 microgram), while ineffective on its own, attenuated all the effects of picrotoxin. The results suggest that similar synaptic mechanisms in the amygdala, medial septum, and hippocampus are involved in memory consolidation: NMDA, muscarinic, and beta-noradrenergic receptors stimulate and GABA-A receptors inhibit this process, and beta-noradrenergic receptors modulate the GABAergic synapses. In the avoidance task these mechanisms operate in the three structures: in habituation only those in the hippocampus are operative. Possibly in each structure these mechanisms regulate, if not actually consolidate, a different aspect, component, or form of memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1358054     DOI: 10.1016/0163-1047(92)90847-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neural Biol        ISSN: 0163-1047


  69 in total

Review 1.  Functional activities of the amygdala: an overview.

Authors:  A A Rasia-Filho; R G Londero; M Achaval
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 2.  Participation of CaMKII in neuronal plasticity and memory formation.

Authors:  Martín Cammarota; Lia R M Bevilaqua; Haydée Viola; Daniel S Kerr; Bruno Reichmann; Viviane Teixeira; Mário Bulla; Iván Izquierdo; Jorge H Medina
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.046

3.  Glutamatergic activity in the amygdala signals visceral input during taste memory formation.

Authors:  Maria Isabel Miranda; Guillaume Ferreira; Leticia Ramirez-Lugo; Federico Bermudez-Rattoni
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Molecular mechanisms of memory retrieval.

Authors:  German Szapiro; Julieta M Galante; Daniela M Barros; Miguelina Levi de Stein; Monica R M Vianna; Luciana A Izquierdo; Ivan Izquierdo; Jorge H Medina
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.996

5.  Gene expression during memory formation.

Authors:  Lionel Muller Igaz; Pedro Bekinschtein; Monica M R Vianna; Ivan Izquierdo; Jorge H Medina
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.911

6.  Effect of MK-801-induced impairment of inhibitory avoidance learning in zebrafish via inactivation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) in telencephalon.

Authors:  Ming-Chong Ng; Chun-Po Hsu; Yao-Ju Wu; Shih-Yu Wu; Yi-Ling Yang; Kwok-Tung Lu
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.794

7.  Acetylcholine release in the hippocampus and striatum during place and response training.

Authors:  Jason C Pych; Qing Chang; Cynthia Colon-Rivera; Renee Haag; Paul E Gold
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Pretraining but not preexposure to the task apparatus prevents the memory impairment induced by blockade of protein synthesis, PKA or MAP kinase in rats.

Authors:  João Quevedo; Monica R M Vianna; Rafael Roesler; Marcio Rodrigo Martins; Fernanda de-Paris; Jorge H Medina; Ivan Izquierdo
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.996

9.  Memory impairment induced by sodium fluoride is associated with changes in brain monoamine levels.

Authors:  Marcela Pereira; Patrícia A Dombrowski; Estela M Losso; Lea R Chioca; Cláudio Da Cunha; Roberto Andreatini
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.911

10.  Hippocampal acetylcholine release during memory testing in rats: augmentation by glucose.

Authors:  M E Ragozzino; K E Unick; P E Gold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.