Literature DB >> 1355526

Effect of stimulus contrast and size on NMDA receptor activity in cat lateral geniculate nucleus.

Y H Kwon1, S B Nelson, L J Toth, M Sur.   

Abstract

1. We studied the effect of varying excitatory and inhibitory drive on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-mediated component of the visual responses of neurons in the cat dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) by varying the contrast and size of stimuli presented to the receptive fields of these cells. 2. Cells were classified as either on- or off-center, X or Y, and lagged or nonlagged. Stimulus contrast, and hence the amount of excitatory drive, was varied by changing the brightness of a spot, whose size and location matched the cell's receptive field center, relative to a fixed background luminance. Responses to varying contrast were collected from each cell before, during, and after iontophoretic application of D-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (D-APV), a specific NMDA receptor antagonist. From each contrast-response plot, a sigmoidal curve fit yielded five parameters on which we examined the effect of D-APV: the threshold contrast, saturation contrast, contrast at half saturation (C50), slope (gain) at C50, and saturation response. 3. In most cells, application of D-APV reduced both the saturation response and the gain of the contrast-response curve, but did not reduce or change significantly the threshold contrast, saturation contrast, or C50. 4. Cells varied in their sensitivity to D-APV, but for any given cell, the D-APV-sensitive component was nearly always a linear function of the control visual response level. Thus, for a spot of optimal size, there was a constant proportion of the visual response attributable to NMDA receptors, regardless of the amplitude of the response. 5. When the effect of D-APV on the visual responses to an optimal spot at varying contrasts was compared among different classes of dLGN cells, the visual responses of lagged X cells were reduced to a greater extent than those of either nonlagged X cells or the combined population of nonlagged X and Y cells. 6. Stimulus size (spot diameter) was also varied systematically at a fixed contrast to vary the inhibitory drive to dLGN cells. As stimulus size was increased, the response first increased because of increased stimulation of the receptive field center and then decreased because of increasing amounts of surround inhibition. 7. The D-APV-sensitive component of individual cell responses was greater when the stimulus spot was less than or equal to optimal size than when the spot was larger. Thus the contribution of NMDA receptors to the visual response decreased with increasing surround inhibition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1355526     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1992.68.1.182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  15 in total

1.  Early-stage visual processing deficits in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Pamela D Butler; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.741

Review 2.  The thalamo-cortical auditory receptive fields: regulation by the states of vigilance, learning and the neuromodulatory systems.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Neurophysiological models for new treatment development in schizophrenia: early sensory approaches.

Authors:  Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Magnocellular contributions to impaired motion processing in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Dongsoo Kim; Glenn Wylie; Roey Pasternak; Pamela D Butler; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  A simple model of retina-LGN transmission.

Authors:  Alexander Casti; Fernand Hayot; Youping Xiao; Ehud Kaplan
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Contributions of low and high spatial frequency processing to impaired object recognition circuitry in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Daniel J Calderone; Matthew J Hoptman; Antígona Martínez; Sangeeta Nair-Collins; Cristina J Mauro; Moshe Bar; Daniel C Javitt; Pamela D Butler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Early-stage visual processing and cortical amplification deficits in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Pamela D Butler; Vance Zemon; Isaac Schechter; Alice M Saperstein; Matthew J Hoptman; Kelvin O Lim; Nadine Revheim; Gail Silipo; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2005-05

8.  Subcortical visual dysfunction in schizophrenia drives secondary cortical impairments.

Authors:  Pamela D Butler; Antigona Martinez; John J Foxe; Dongsoo Kim; Vance Zemon; Gail Silipo; Jeannette Mahoney; Marina Shpaner; Maria Jalbrzikowski; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 9.  Thinking glutamatergically: changing concepts of schizophrenia based upon changing neurochemical models.

Authors:  Joshua T Kantrowitz; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses       Date:  2010-10

Review 10.  Perception measurement in clinical trials of schizophrenia: promising paradigms from CNTRICS.

Authors:  Michael F Green; Pamela D Butler; Yue Chen; Mark A Geyer; Steven Silverstein; Jonathan K Wynn; Jong H Yoon; Vance Zemon
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 9.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.